Hungarian Parliamentary Election, 2006 - Results

Results

Party SMCs MMCs National
seats
Total
seats
+/–
Votes % Seats Votes % Seats
Fidesz-MPSZ-KDNP 2,269,241 42.0 68 2,272,979 42.0 69 27 164 –24
Hungarian Socialist Party 2,175,312 40.3 98 2,336,705 43.2 71 17 186 –2
Alliance of Free Democrats 340,746 6.3 3 351,612 6.5 4 11 18 –1
Hungarian Democratic Forum 238,566 4.4 0 272,831 5.0 2 9 11 +11
MSZP-SZDSZ 154,619 2.9 6 0 6
Hungarian Justice and Life Party-Jobbik 92,798 1.7 0 119,007 2.2 0 0 0 0
Fidesz-MPSZ-KDNP-MDF 34,109 0.6 0 0 0
Hungarian Communist Workers' Party 16,379 0.3 0 21,955 0.4 0 0 0 0
Centre Party 14,126 0.3 0 17,431 0.3 0 0 0 0
MDF-Solidarity for Szabolcs County 13,672 0.3 0 0 0
Association for Somogy 9,457 0.2 1 0 1 New
Forum of Gipsy Organisations in Hungary-Party of Roma Solidarity 7,165 0.1 0 4,459 0.1 0 0 0 New
Party of Greens 4,678 0.1 0 2,870 0.1 0 0 0 New
Christian Democratic Party - Solidarity of Christian Social Centre 2,906 0.1 0 2,362 0.1 0 0 0 New
Hungarian Countryside and Civic Party 2,716 0.0 0 2,789 0.1 0 0 0 New
Independent Smallholders Party 2,030 0.0 0 838 0.0 0 0 0 0
Live Chain for Hungary 2,002 0.0 0 0 0 New
Workers' Party of Hungary 2006 1,489 0.0 0 556 0.0 0 0 0 New
Hungarian Pensioners Party-MDF 1,166 0.0 0 0 0
Alliance of Hungarians for One Another 904 0.0 0 767 0.0 0 0 0 New
Party of Independent Smallholders and National Unity 742 0.0 0 889 0.0 0 0 0 New
Hungarian Pensioners Party 505 0.0 0 0 0 0
Social Democratic Party 118 0.0 0 0 0 0
Alliance of Green Democrats 95 0.0 0 0 0 New
Létalap 80 0.0 0 0 0 New
Independents 18,054 0.3 0 0 0
Invalid/blank votes 51,402 47,302
Total 5,455,077 100 176 5,455,352 100 140 70 386 0
Registered voters/turnout 8,046,129 67.8 8,046,129 67.8
Source: Nohlen & Stöver

Read more about this topic:  Hungarian Parliamentary Election, 2006

Famous quotes containing the word results:

    It is perhaps the principal admirableness of the Gothic schools of architecture, that they receive the results of the labour of inferior minds; and out of fragments full of imperfection ... raise up a stately and unaccusable whole.
    John Ruskin (1819–1900)

    In the works of man, everything is as poor as its author; vision is confined, means are limited, scope is restricted, movements are labored, and results are humdrum.
    Joseph De Maistre (1753–1821)

    “The ideal reasoner,” he remarked, “would, when he had once been shown a single fact in all its bearings, deduce from it not only all the chain of events which led up to it but also all the results which would follow from it.”
    Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859–1930)