The Role of The Railway in The Final Solution
Within various phases of the Holocaust, the trains were used differently:
- After economic discrimination and separation, trains were used to concentrate the populations, either in ghettos, or—more often—to transport them to forced labour or concentration camps
- After concentration within ghettos, to transport the inmates to death camps
The scale of the extermination of members of groups targeted in the Final Solution was therefore only dependent on two factors:
- The capacity of the death camps to murder victims and process bodies
- The capacity of the railways to transport the condemned from the ghettos to the death camps
The most modern accurate numbers on the scale of the Final Solution still rely today partly on shipping records of the German railways.
Read more about this topic: Holocaust Train
Famous quotes containing the words role, railway, final and/or solution:
“Whether or not you have children yourself, you are a parent to the next generation. If we can only stop thinking of children as individual property and think of them as the next generation, then we can realize we all have a role to play.”
—Charlotte Davis Kasl (20th century)
“Her personality had an architectonic quality; I think of her when I see some of the great London railway termini, especially St. Pancras, with its soot and turrets, and she overshadowed her own daughters, whom she did not understand—my mother, who liked things to be nice; my dotty aunt. But my mother had not the strength to put even some physical distance between them, let alone keep the old monster at emotional arm’s length.”
—Angela Carter (1940–1992)
“The final test of a leader is that he leaves behind him in other men the conviction and the will to carry on.... The genius of a good leader is to leave behind him a situation which common sense, without the grace of genius, can deal with successfully.”
—Walter Lippmann (1889–1974)
“Give a scientist a problem and he will probably provide a solution; historians and sociologists, by contrast, can offer only opinions. Ask a dozen chemists the composition of an organic compound such as methane, and within a short time all twelve will have come up with the same solution of CH4. Ask, however, a dozen economists or sociologists to provide policies to reduce unemployment or the level of crime and twelve widely differing opinions are likely to be offered.”
—Derek Gjertsen, British scientist, author. Science and Philosophy: Past and Present, ch. 3, Penguin (1989)