Hamster Wheel - Use By Animals

Use By Animals

Like other rodents, hamsters are highly motivated to run in wheels; it is not uncommon to record distances of 9 km (5.6 mi) being run in one night. Other 24-h records include 43 km (27 mi) for rats, 31 km (19 mi) for wild mice, 19 km (12 mi) for lemmings, 16 km (9.9 mi) for laboratory mice, and 8 km (5.0 mi) for gerbils. Hypotheses to explain such high levels of running in wheels include a need for activity, substitute for exploration, and stereotypic behaviour, but various experimental results strongly suggest that wheel running, like play or the runner's high, is rewarding in and of itself and highly valued by the animals (in the sense that they are willing to work for it - i.e. bar-press or lift weighted doors). This makes running wheels a popular type of enrichment to the captivity conditions of rodents.

Hamsters keep on using wheels even in captivity conditions that include other kinds of enrichment. In one experiment, Syrian hamsters that could use tunnels to access a total of five cages, each containing a toy, showed no more than a 25% reduction in running-wheel use as compared to hamsters housed in a single cage without toys (except for the running wheel). In another study, female Syrian hamsters housed with a nestbox, bedding, hay, paper towels, cardboard tubes, and branches were observed using a wheel regularly, and benefitted from it in showing less stereotypic bar-gnawing and producing larger litters of young as compared to females kept under the same conditions but without a wheel.

Running in wheels can be so intense in hamsters that it may result in foot lesions, which appear as small cuts on the paw pads or toes. Such paw wounds rapidly scab over and do not prevent hamsters from continuing to run in their wheel.

Read more about this topic:  Hamster Wheel

Famous quotes containing the word animals:

    I wish more and more that health were studied half as much as disease is. Why, with all the endowment of research against cancer is no study made of those who are free from cancer? Why not inquire what foods they eat, what habits of body and mind they cultivate? And why never study animals in health and natural surroundings? why always sickened and in an environment of strangeness and artificiality?
    Sarah N. Cleghorn (1976–1959)