Frobenius Method - Explanation

Explanation

The Frobenius method tells us that we can seek a power series solution of the form

Differentiating:

Substituting:

\begin{align} & {} \quad z^2\sum_{k=0}^\infty (k+r-1)(k+r)A_kz^{k+r-2} + zp(z) \sum_{k=0}^\infty (k+r)A_kz^{k+r-1} + q(z)\sum_{k=0}^\infty A_kz^{k+r} \\ & = \sum_{k=0}^\infty (k+r-1) (k+r)A_kz^{k+r} + p(z) \sum_{k=0}^\infty (k+r)A_kz^{k+r} + q(z) \sum_{k=0}^\infty A_kz^{k+r} \\ & = \sum_{k=0}^\infty (k+r-1)(k+r) A_kz^{k+r} + p(z) (k+r) A_kz^{k+r} + q(z) A_kz^{k+r} \\ & = \sum_{k=0}^\infty \left A_kz^{k+r} \\ & = \left A_0z^r+\sum_{k=1}^\infty \left A_kz^{k+r} \end{align}

The expression

is known as the indicial polynomial, which is quadratic in r. The general definition of the indicial polynomial is the coefficient of the lowest power of z in the infinite series. In this case it happens to be that this is the rth coefficient but, it is possible for the lowest possible exponent to be r − 2, r − 1 or, something else depending on the given differential equation. This detail is important to keep in mind because one can end up with complicated expressions in the process of synchronizing all the series of the differential equation to start at the same index value which in the above expression is k = 1. However, in solving for the indicial roots attention is focused only on the coefficient of the lowest power of z.

Using this, the general expression of the coefficient of zk + r is

These coefficients must be zero, since they should be solutions of the differential equation, so

The series solution with Ak above,

satisfies

If we choose one of the roots to the indicial polynomial for r in Ur(z), we gain a solution to the differential equation. If the difference between the roots is not an integer, we get another, linearly independent solution in the other root.

Read more about this topic:  Frobenius Method

Famous quotes containing the word explanation:

    “How strange a scene is this in which we are such shifting figures, pictures, shadows. The mystery of our existence—I have no faith in any attempted explanation of it. It is all a dark, unfathomed profound.”
    —Rutherford Birchard Hayes (1822–1893)

    “Natural selection, the blind, unconscious, automatic process which Darwin discovered, and which we now know is the explanation for the existence and apparently purposeful form of all life, has no purpose in mind. It has no mind and no mind’s eye. It does not plan for the future. It has no vision, no foresight, no sight at all. If it can be said to play the role of the watchmaker in nature, it is the blind watchmaker.”
    —Richard Dawkins (b. 1941)

    “The explanation of the propensity of the English people to portrait painting is to be found in their relish for a Fact. Let a man do the grandest things, fight the greatest battles, or be distinguished by the most brilliant personal heroism, yet the English people would prefer his portrait to a painting of the great deed. The likeness they can judge of; his existence is a Fact. But the truth of the picture of his deeds they cannot judge of, for they have no imagination.”
    —Benjamin Haydon (1786–1846)