Fourier Transform On Finite Groups - Fourier Transform On Finite Abelian Groups

Fourier Transform On Finite Abelian Groups

Since the irreducible representations of finite abelian groups are all of degree 1 and hence equal to the irreducible characters of the group, Fourier analysis on finite abelian groups is significantly simplified. For instance, the Fourier transform yields a scalar- and not matrix-valued function.

Furthermore, the irreducible characters of a group may be put in one-to-one correspondence with the elements of the group.

Therefore, we may define the Fourier transform for finite abelian groups as


\widehat{f}(s) = \sum_{a \in G} f(a) \bar{\chi_s}(a).

Note that the right-hand side is simply for the inner product on the vector space of functions from to defined by


\langle f, g \rangle = \sum_{a \in G} f(a) \bar{g}(a).

The inverse Fourier transform is then given by


f(a) = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{s \in G} \widehat{f}(s) \chi_s(a).

A property that is often useful in probability is that the Fourier transform of the uniform distribution is simply where 0 is the group identity and is the Kronecker delta.

Read more about this topic:  Fourier Transform On Finite Groups

Famous quotes containing the words transform, finite and/or groups:

    Government ... thought [it] could transform the country through massive national programs, but often the programs did not work. Too often they only made things worse. In our rush to accomplish great deeds quickly, we trampled on sound principles of restraint and endangered the rights of individuals.
    Gerald R. Ford (b. 1913)

    Any language is necessarily a finite system applied with different degrees of creativity to an infinite variety of situations, and most of the words and phrases we use are “prefabricated” in the sense that we don’t coin new ones every time we speak.
    David Lodge (b. 1935)

    ... until both employers’ and workers’ groups assume responsibility for chastising their own recalcitrant children, they can vainly bay the moon about “ignorant” and “unfair” public criticism. Moreover, their failure to impose voluntarily upon their own groups codes of decency and honor will result in more and more necessity for government control.
    Mary Barnett Gilson (1877–?)