Accounting Treatment
Accounting for firm-specific infrastructure investment varies by jurisdiction. The GAAP framework is the most generally applied, though not followed everywhere.
In Canada, one focus of accounting reform efforts is to match Capital Cost Allowance for asset depreciation to either actual, or desirable, asset lifecycle of each type of asset. There are numerous tradeoffs in policy including the dangers of encouraging waste if assets too easily become a "writeoff", or failing to keep up with the technology of a rapidly changing industrial base.
With respect to information technology in particular this is a cogent concern, as toxic e-waste is becoming an increasing problem everywhere computers and cell phones are used.
In Canada the rapid writeoff of new technology has been linked to the goal of sustainability, so that only those assets which aid in energy conservation, materials conservation and waste reduction quality for favourable accounting treatment. With respect to public infrastructure, this goal is being pursued a different way - via best practice exchange in sustainable municipal infrastructure, and government performance auditing.
Read more about this topic: Firm-specific Infrastructure
Famous quotes containing the words accounting and/or treatment:
“I, who am king of the matter I treat, and who owe an accounting for it to no one, do not for all that believe myself in all I write. I often hazard sallies of my mind which I mistrust.”
—Michel de Montaigne (1533–1592)
“A regular council was held with the Indians, who had come in on their ponies, and speeches were made on both sides through an interpreter, quite in the described mode,—the Indians, as usual, having the advantage in point of truth and earnestness, and therefore of eloquence. The most prominent chief was named Little Crow. They were quite dissatisfied with the white man’s treatment of them, and probably have reason to be so.”
—Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)