Accounting Treatment
Accounting for firm-specific infrastructure investment varies by jurisdiction. The GAAP framework is the most generally applied, though not followed everywhere.
In Canada, one focus of accounting reform efforts is to match Capital Cost Allowance for asset depreciation to either actual, or desirable, asset lifecycle of each type of asset. There are numerous tradeoffs in policy including the dangers of encouraging waste if assets too easily become a "writeoff", or failing to keep up with the technology of a rapidly changing industrial base.
With respect to information technology in particular this is a cogent concern, as toxic e-waste is becoming an increasing problem everywhere computers and cell phones are used.
In Canada the rapid writeoff of new technology has been linked to the goal of sustainability, so that only those assets which aid in energy conservation, materials conservation and waste reduction quality for favourable accounting treatment. With respect to public infrastructure, this goal is being pursued a different way - via best practice exchange in sustainable municipal infrastructure, and government performance auditing.
Read more about this topic: Firm-specific Infrastructure
Famous quotes containing the words accounting and/or treatment:
“I, who am king of the matter I treat, and who owe an accounting for it to no one, do not for all that believe myself in all I write. I often hazard sallies of my mind which I mistrust.”
—Michel de Montaigne (1533–1592)
“[17th-century] Puritans were the first modern parents. Like many of us, they looked on their treatment of children as a test of their own self-control. Their goal was not to simply to ensure the child’s duty to the family, but to help him or her make personal, individual commitments. They were the first authors to state that children must obey God rather than parents, in case of a clear conflict.”
—C. John Sommerville (20th century)