Finite Thickness

In formal language theory, a class of languages has finite thickness if for every string s, there are only finitely many consistent languages in . This condition was introduced by Dana Angluin in connection with learning, as a sufficient condition for language identification in the limit. The related notion of M-finite thickness

We say that satisfies the MEF-condition if for each string s and each consistent language L in the class, there is a minimal consistent language in, which is a sublanguage of L. Symmetrically, we say that satisfies the MFF-condition if for every string s there are only finitely many minimal consistent languages in . Finally, is said to have M-finite thickness if it satisfies both the MEF and MFF conditions.

Finite thickness implies M-finite thickness. However, there are classes that are of M-finite thickness but not of finite thickness (for example, let be a class of languages such that ).

Famous quotes containing the words finite and/or thickness:

    Are not all finite beings better pleased with motions relative than absolute?
    Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)

    For his teeth seem for laughing round an apple.
    There lurk no claws behind his fingers supple;
    And God will grow no talons at his heels,
    Nor antlers through the thickness of his curls.
    Wilfred Owen (1893–1918)