Action of The Absolute Galois Group
The absolute Galois group Gal(kalg/k) of k naturally acts on the zero-locus in An(kalg) of a subset of the polynomial ring k. In general, if V is a scheme over k (e.g. a k-algebraic set), Gal(kalg/k) naturally acts on V ×Spec(k) Spec(kalg) via its action on Spec(kalg).
When V is a variety defined over a perfect field k, the scheme V can be recovered from the scheme V ×Spec(k) Spec(kalg) together with the action of Gal(kalg/k) on the latter scheme: the sections of the structure sheaf of V on an open subset U are exactly the sections of the structure sheaf of V ×Spec(k) Spec(kalg) on U ×Spec(k) Spec(kalg) whose residues are constant on each Gal(kalg/k)-orbit in U ×Spec(k) Spec(kalg). In the affine case, this means the action of the absolute Galois group on the zero-locus is sufficient to recover the subset of k consisting of vanishing polynomials.
In general, this information is not sufficient to recover V. In the example of the zero-locus of x1p- t in (Fp(t))alg, the variety consists of a single point and so the action of the absolute Galois group cannot distinguish whether the ideal of vanishing polynomials was generated by x1 - t1/p, by x1p- t, or, indeed, by x1 - t1/p raised to some other power of p.
For any subfield L of kalg and any L-variety V, an automorphism σ of kalg will map V isomorphically onto a σ(L)-variety.
Read more about this topic: Field Of Definition
Famous quotes containing the words action of the, action, absolute and/or group:
“The highest proof of civility is that the whole public action of the State is directed on securing the greatest good of the greatest number.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)
“You mustn’t look in my novel for the old stable ego of the character. There is another ego, according to whose action the individual is unrecognisable.”
—D.H. (David Herbert)
“A man in the view of absolute goodness, adores, with total humility. Every step downward, is a step upward. The man who renounces himself, comes to himself.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)
“If the Russians have gone too far in subjecting the child and his peer group to conformity to a single set of values imposed by the adult society, perhaps we have reached the point of diminishing returns in allowing excessive autonomy and in failing to utilize the constructive potential of the peer group in developing social responsibility and consideration for others.”
—Urie Bronfenbrenner (b. 1917)