Fibonacci Polynomials - Definition

Definition

These Fibonacci polynomials are defined by a recurrence relation:

F_n(x)= \begin{cases} 0, & \mbox{if } n = 0\\ 1, & \mbox{if } n = 1\\ x F_{n - 1}(x) + F_{n - 2}(x),& \mbox{if } n \geq 2 \end{cases}

The first few Fibonacci polynomials are:

The Lucas polynomials use the same recurrence with different starting values: L_n(x) = \begin{cases} 2, & \mbox{if } n = 0 \\ x, & \mbox{if } n = 1 \\ x L_{n - 1}(x) + L_{n - 2}(x), & \mbox{if } n \geq 2. \end{cases}

The first few Lucas polynomials are:

The Fibonacci and Lucas numbers are recovered by evaluating the polynomials at x = 1; Pell numbers are recovered by evaluating Fn at x = 2. The degrees of Fn is n − 1 and the degree of Ln is n. The ordinary generating function for the sequences are:

The polynomials can be expressed in terms of Lucas sequences as

Read more about this topic:  Fibonacci Polynomials

Famous quotes containing the word definition:

    “The definition of good prose is proper words in their proper places; of good verse, the most proper words in their proper places. The propriety is in either case relative. The words in prose ought to express the intended meaning, and no more; if they attract attention to themselves, it is, in general, a fault.”
    —Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1772–1834)

    “Beauty, like all other qualities presented to human experience, is relative; and the definition of it becomes unmeaning and useless in proportion to its abstractness. To define beauty not in the most abstract, but in the most concrete terms possible, not to find a universal formula for it, but the formula which expresses most adequately this or that special manifestation of it, is the aim of the true student of aesthetics.”
    —Walter Pater (1839–1894)

    “Was man made stupid to see his own stupidity?
    Is God by definition indifferent, beyond us all?
    Is the eternal truth man’s fighting soul
    Wherein the Beast ravens in its own avidity?”
    —Richard Eberhart (b. 1904)