Family Court of Australia - Difference Between Married and De Facto Relationships

Difference Between Married and De Facto Relationships

The Commonwealth power to legislate for marriage and ‘matrimonial causes’ is supported by sections 51(xxi) and (xxii) of the Constitution, whereas the power to legislate for de facto financial matters largely relies on referrals by States to the Commonwealth in accordance with section 51(xxxvii) of the Australian Constitution. A special cause was created called a ‘de facto financial cause’ see the Family Law Amendment (De Facto Financial Matters and Other Measures) Bill 2008 Explanatory Memorandum

However, the definitions of ‘matrimonial cause’ and ‘de facto financial cause’ differ in some respects, due to the different sources of Commonwealth power to legislate for these matters. Paragraphs (a) to (d) of the definition of ‘de facto financial cause’, in the Family Law Act 1975 therefore, limit the proceedings within each of those sections to proceedings taken once the relevant de facto relationship has broken down.

Read more about this topic:  Family Court Of Australia

Famous quotes containing the words difference between, difference, married and/or facto:

    The difference between heresy and prophecy is often one of sequence. Heresy often turns out to have been prophecy—when properly aged.
    Hubert H. Humphrey (1911–1978)

    When a man’s partner is killed he’s supposed to do something about it. It doesn’t make any difference what you thought of him. He was your partner, and you’re supposed to do something about it.
    Dashiell Hammett (1894–1961)

    Roger Thornhill: Has life been like that?
    Eve Kendall: Uhm mm.
    Roger Thornhill: How come?
    Eve Kendall: Men like you.
    Roger Thornhill: What’s wrong with men like me?
    Eve Kendall: They don’t believe in marriage.
    Roger Thornhill: I’ve been married twice.
    Eve Kendall: See what I mean?
    Ernest Lehman (b.1920)

    I incline to think that the people will not now sustain the policy of upholding a State Government against a rival government, by the use of the forces of the United States. If this leads to the overthrow of the de jure government in a State, the de facto government must be recognized.
    Rutherford Birchard Hayes (1822–1893)