Ethical Reflection
The focal point of EVT is the effectiveness of one's actions when communicating with another, this perspective creates an opportunity for deception. Before we willingly violate another persons expectations we should consider what is ethical. According to Immanuel Kant's theory of categorical imperative any time we speak or act, we have a moral obligation to be truthful. Kant wrote that "truthfulness in statements which cannot be avoided is the formal duty of an individual to everyone, however great may be the disadvantage accruing to himself or another." (Kant 1964) Exceptions are continually made when it comes to walking the line of morality; we may disregard white lies, justify deception for the good of others, or avoid the outcomes of the truth all together. Categorical imperative is a method for determining right from wrong by thinking through the ethical valence of an act, regardless of motive. In terms of EVT, Kant would have us look at the violation we are considering and ask, What if everybody did that all the time? If we don't like the answer then we have a solemn duty not to do the deed. Unless we can embrace the idea of everyone in the world undergoing the same action we should not do the deed.
Read more about this topic: Expectancy Violations Theory
Famous quotes containing the words ethical and/or reflection:
“There are two kinds of liberalism. A liberalism which is always, subterraneously authoritative and paternalistic, on the side of one’s good conscience. And then there is a liberalism which is more ethical than political; one would have to find another name for this. Something like a profound suspension of judgment.”
—Roland Barthes (1915–1980)
“If the contemplation, even of inanimate beauty, is so delightful; if it ravishes the senses, even when the fair form is foreign to us: What must be the effects of moral beauty? And what influence must it have, when it embellishes our own mind, and is the result of our own reflection and industry?”
—David Hume (1711–1776)