Details
An expanded memory board, being a hardware peripheral, needed a software device driver, which exported its services. Such a device driver was called expanded memory manager. Its name was variable; the previously mentioned boards used REMM.SYS (AST), PS2EMM.SYS (IBM), AEMM.SYS (AT&T) and EMM.SYS (Intel) respectively. Later, the expression became associated with software-only solutions requiring the Intel 80386 processor, for example Quarterdeck's QEMM, Qualitas' 386MAX or the default EMM386 in MS-DOS, PC DOS and DR-DOS.
Expanded memory was a common term for several incompatible technology variants. EEMS, an expanded memory management standard competing with LIM EMS, was developed by AST Research, Quadram and Ashton-Tate. It allowed to also remap some or all of the lower 1024 KiB of memory not associated with interrupts or dedicated I/O memory (such as network or video cards), so that entire programs could be switched in and out of the extra RAM. This feature was used by early DOS multitasker software such as DESQview. The two standards were eventually combined as LIM EMS 4.0.
Expanded Memory usage declined in the 1990s. The IBM AT Intel 80286 supported 24 bits of address space (16 MiB) in protected mode and the 386 supported 32 bit addresses, or 4 gibibytes (GiB) of RAM - roughly four thousand times the addressable space of the original 8086. DOS itself did not directly support protected mode, but Microsoft eventually developed DPMI and several DOS extenders were published based on it. DOS programs like DOOM could use extenders like DOS/4G to run in protected mode while still using the DOS API. In the early 1990s new operating systems like Linux, Microsoft Windows NT, OS/2, and BSD/OS supported protected mode 'out of the box'. These and similar developments rendered Expanded Memory an obsolete concept.
Read more about this topic: Expanded Memory
Famous quotes containing the word details:
“Then he told the news media
the strange details of his death
and they hammered him up in the marketplace
and sold him and sold him and sold him.
My death the same.”
—Anne Sexton (1928–1974)
“There was a time when the average reader read a novel simply for the moral he could get out of it, and however naïve that may have been, it was a good deal less naïve than some of the limited objectives he has now. Today novels are considered to be entirely concerned with the social or economic or psychological forces that they will by necessity exhibit, or with those details of daily life that are for the good novelist only means to some deeper end.”
—Flannery O’Connor (1925–1964)
“Different persons growing up in the same language are like different bushes trimmed and trained to take the shape of identical elephants. The anatomical details of twigs and branches will fulfill the elephantine form differently from bush to bush, but the overall outward results are alike.”
—Willard Van Orman Quine (b. 1908)