Background and Definition
Evidence based medicine (EBM) has evolved from clinical epidemiology, a discipline promoted by the creation of the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology in 1988. Clinical epidemiology aims to bridge the gap between clinical practice and public health using population health sciences to inform clinical practice. Thus, the methodology that underpins EBM applies methods used in the field of epidemiology to the clinical context (i.e. clinical epidemiology). In essence, EBM incorporates this quantitative (as well as qualitative) methodology in the βartβ of clinical practice, so as to make the framework for clinical decisions more objective by better reflecting the evidence from research.By introducing scientific methods β particularly the methods of the population sciences β in clinical decision making, EBM has driven a transformation of clinical practice in medicine.
In 1996 David Sackett wrote that "Evidence-based medicine is the conscientious, explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients." This definition, put forward by one of the original proponents of evidence-based medicine, has since been adopted by major organizations, including the Cochrane Collaboration and the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine.
Read more about this topic: Evidence-based Medicine
Famous quotes containing the words background and, background and/or definition:
“... every experience in life enriches ones background and should teach valuable lessons.”
—Mary Barnett Gilson (1877?)
“Pilate with his question What is truth? is gladly trotted out these days as an advocate of Christ, so as to arouse the suspicion that everything known and knowable is an illusion and to erect the cross upon that gruesome background of the impossibility of knowledge.”
—Friedrich Nietzsche (18441900)
“The man who knows governments most completely is he who troubles himself least about a definition which shall give their essence. Enjoying an intimate acquaintance with all their particularities in turn, he would naturally regard an abstract conception in which these were unified as a thing more misleading than enlightening.”
—William James (18421910)