Eulerian Numbers of The Second Kind
The permutations of the multiset {1, 1, 2, 2, ···, n, n} which have the property that for each k, all the numbers appearing between the two occurrences of k in the permutation are greater than k are counted by the double factorial number (2n−1)!!. The Eulerian number of the second kind, denoted, counts the number of all such permutations that have exactly m ascents. For instance, for n = 3 there are 15 such permutations, 1 with no ascents, 8 with a single ascent, and 6 with two ascents:
The Eulerian numbers of the second kind satisfy the recurrence relation, that follows directly from the above definition:
with initial condition for n = 0, expressed in Iverson bracket notation:
Correspondingly, the Eulerian polynomial of second kind, here denoted Pn (no standard notation exists for them) are
and the above recurrence relations are translated into a recurrence relation for the sequence Pn(x):
with initial condition
The latter recurrence may be written in a somehow more compact form by means of an integrating factor:
so that the rational function
satisfies a simple autonomous recurrence:
whence one obtains the Eulerian polynomials as Pn(x) = (1−x)2n un(x), and the Eulerian numbers of the second kind as their coefficients.
Here are some values of the second order Eulerian numbers (sequence A008517 in OEIS):
-
n \ m 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 8 6 4 1 22 58 24 5 1 52 328 444 120 6 1 114 1452 4400 3708 720 7 1 240 5610 32120 58140 33984 5040 8 1 494 19950 195800 644020 785304 341136 40320 9 1 1004 67260 1062500 5765500 12440064 11026296 3733920 362880
The sum of the n-th row, which is also the value Pn(1), is then (2n−1)!!.
Read more about this topic: Eulerian Number
Famous quotes containing the words numbers and/or kind:
“The barriers of conventionality have been raised so high, and so strangely cemented by long existence, that the only hope of overthrowing them exists in the union of numbers linked together by common opinion and effort ... the united watchword of thousands would strike at the foundation of the false system and annihilate it.”
—Mme. Ellen Louise Demorest 18241898, U.S. womens magazine editor and womans club movement pioneer. Demorests Illustrated Monthly and Mirror of Fashions, p. 203 (January 1870)
“It was easy to recognize in him the anti-social animus of a born evangelist, but there was also something elsea kind of voluptuous delight in the shabby and preposterous, a perverted aestheticism like that of a latter-day movie or radio fan, a wild will to roll in and snuffle balderdash as a cat rolls in and snuffles catnip.”
—H.L. (Henry Lewis)