EN 13402-4: Coding System
Parts of this article (those related to part 4 of the standard) are outdated. Please update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. |
The fourth part of the standard is still under review. It will define a compact coding system for clothes sizes. This was originally intended primarily for industry use in databases and as a part of stock-keeping identifiers and catalogue ordering numbers, but later users have also expressed a desire to use compact codes for customer communication. Writing out all the centimetre figures of all the primary and secondary measures from EN 13402-2 can – in some cases – require up to 12 digits. The full list of centimetre figures on the pictogram contains a lot of redundancy and the same information can be squeezed into fewer characters with lookup tables. EN 13402-4 will define such tables.
Bust | 68 | 72 | 76 | 80 | 84 | 88 | 92 | 96 | 100 | 104 | 110 | 116 | 122 | 128 | 134 | 140 | 146 | 152 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Waist | 52 | 56 | 60 | 64 | 68 | 72 | 76 | 80 | 84 | 88 | 94 | 100 | 106 | 112 | 118 | 124 | 130 | 136 | |||
Label | XXS | XS | S | M | L | XL | XXL | 3XL | 4XL | ||||||||||||
Code | 0__ | 1__ | 2__ | 3__ | 4__ | 5__ | 6__ | 7__ | 8__ | ||||||||||||
_0_ | 68 | 76 | 84 | 92 | 100 | 112 | 122 | 132 | 142 | ||||||||||||
_1_ | _5_ | 72 | 80 | 88 | 96 | 106 | 117 | 127 | 137 | 147 | |||||||||||
_2_ | _6_ | 76 | 84 | 92 | 100 | 112 | 122 | 132 | 142 | 152 | |||||||||||
_3_ | _7_ | 80 | 88 | 96 | 106 | 117 | 127 | 137 | 147 | 157 | |||||||||||
_4_ | _8_ | 84 | 92 | 100 | 112 | 122 | 132 | 142 | 152 | 162 | |||||||||||
_9_ | 88 | 96 | 106 | 117 | 127 | 137 | 147 | 157 | 167 | ||||||||||||
Height | 152 | 156 | 160 | 164 | 168 | 172 | 176 | 180 | 184 | 188 | |||||||||||
Code | __0 | __1 | __2 | __3 | __4 | __5 | __6 | __7 | __8 | __9 |
An earlier draft of this part of the standard attempted to list all in-use combinations of EN 13402-3 measures and assigned a short 2- or 3-digit code to each. Some of the industry representatives involved in the standardization process considered this approach too restrictive. Others argued that the primary dimension in centimetres should be a prominent part of the code. Therefore this proposal, originally expected to be adopted in 2005, was rejected.
Primary | Bust | 76 | 80 | 84 | 88 | 92 | 96 | 100 | 104 | 110 | 116 | 122 | 128 | 134 | 140 | 146 | 152 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Waist | 60 | 64 | 68 | 72 | 76 | 80 | 84 | 88 | 94 | 100 | 106 | 112 | 118 | 124 | 130 | 136 | |
Secondary | Code | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | ||||||
Hip-Bust | 0 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 20 | 24 | 28 | 32 | 36 | |||||||
Hip-Waist | 16 | 20 | 24 | 28 | 32 | 36 | 40 | 44 | 48 | 52 | |||||||
Height | 152 | 156 | 160 | 164 | 168 | 172 | 176 | 180 | 184 | 188 |
Since then, several new proposals have been presented to the CEN working group. One of these, tabled by the European Association of National Organisations of Textile Traders (AEDT), proposes a 5-character alphanumeric code, consisting of the 3-digit centimetre figure of the primary body dimension, followed by one or two letters that code a secondary dimension, somewhat like the system already defined for bra sizes. For example, an item designed for 100 cm bust girth, 104 cm hip girth and 176 cm height could bear the compact size code "100BG". This proposal was agreed upon in 2006, but later disregarded. A paper by Bogusławska-Bączek published in 2010 showed that there were still significant difficulties in identifying clothing sizes.
Read more about this topic: EN 13402
Famous quotes containing the word system:
“In nothing was slavery so savage and relentless as in its attempted destruction of the family instincts of the Negro race in America. Individuals, not families; shelters, not homes; herding, not marriages, were the cardinal sins in that system of horrors.”
—Fannie Barrier Williams (18551944)