Elementary Symmetric Polynomial - Definition

Definition

The elementary symmetric polynomials in variables X1, …, Xn, written ek(X1, …, Xn) for k = 0, 1, ..., n, can be defined as

\begin{align} e_0 (X_1, X_2, \dots,X_n) &= 1,\\ e_1 (X_1, X_2, \dots,X_n) &= \textstyle\sum_{1 \leq j \leq n} X_j,\\ e_2 (X_1, X_2, \dots,X_n) &= \textstyle\sum_{1 \leq j < k \leq n} X_j X_k,\\ e_3 (X_1, X_2, \dots,X_n) &= \textstyle\sum_{1 \leq j < k < l \leq n} X_j X_k X_l,\\ \end{align}

and so forth, down to

(sometimes the notation σk is used instead of ek). In general, for k ≥ 0 we define

Thus, for each positive integer less than or equal to, there exists exactly one elementary symmetric polynomial of degree in variables. To form the one which has degree, we form all products of -subsets of the variables and add up these terms.

The fact that and so forth is the defining feature of commutative algebra. That is, the polynomial ring formed by taking all linear combinations of products of the elementary symmetric polynomials is a commutative ring.

Read more about this topic:  Elementary Symmetric Polynomial

Famous quotes containing the word definition:

    “It is very hard to give a just definition of love. The most we can say of it is this: that in the soul, it is a desire to rule; in the spirit, it is a sympathy; and in the body, it is but a hidden and subtle desire to possess—after many mysteries—what one loves.”
    —François, Duc De La Rochefoucauld (1613–1680)

    “According to our social pyramid, all men who feel displaced racially, culturally, and/or because of economic hardships will turn on those whom they feel they can order and humiliate, usually women, children, and animals—just as they have been ordered and humiliated by those privileged few who are in power. However, this definition does not explain why there are privileged men who behave this way toward women.”
    —Ana Castillo (b. 1953)

    “Scientific method is the way to truth, but it affords, even in
    principle, no unique definition of truth. Any so-called pragmatic
    definition of truth is doomed to failure equally.”
    —Willard Van Orman Quine (b. 1908)