Electronic Filter - Classification By Design Methodology

Classification By Design Methodology

Linear analog electronic filters
Network synthesis filters
  • Butterworth filter
  • Chebyshev filter
  • Elliptic (Cauer) filter
  • Bessel filter
  • Gaussian filter
  • Optimum "L" (Legendre) filter
  • Linkwitz-Riley filter
Image impedance filters
  • Constant k filter
  • m-derived filter
  • General image filters
  • Zobel network (constant R) filter
  • Lattice filter (all-pass)
  • Bridged T delay equaliser (all-pass)
  • Composite image filter
  • mm'-type filter
Simple filters
  • RC filter
  • RL filter
  • LC filter
  • RLC filter


Historically, linear analog filter design has evolved through three major approaches. The oldest designs are simple circuits where the main design criterion was the Q factor of the circuit. This reflected the radio receiver application of filtering as Q was a measure of the frequency selectivity of a tuning circuit. From the 1920s filters began to be designed from the image point of view, mostly being driven by the requirements of telecommunications. After World War II the dominant methodology was network synthesis. The higher mathematics used originally required extensive tables of polynomial coefficient values to be published but modern computer resources have made that unnecessary.

Read more about this topic:  Electronic Filter

Famous quotes containing the words design and/or methodology:

    “With wonderful art he grinds into paint for his picture all his moods and experiences, so that all his forces may be brought to the encounter. Apparently writing without a particular design or responsibility, setting down his soliloquies from time to time, taking advantage of all his humors, when at length the hour comes to declare himself, he puts down in plain English, without quotation marks, what he, Thomas Carlyle, is ready to defend in the face of the world.”
    —Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)

    “One might get the impression that I recommend a new methodology which replaces induction by counterinduction and uses a multiplicity of theories, metaphysical views, fairy tales, instead of the customary pair theory/observation. This impression would certainly be mistaken. My intention is not to replace one set of general rules by another such set: my intention is rather to convince the reader that all methodologies, even the most obvious ones, have their limits.”
    —Paul Feyerabend (1924–1994)