Eisner V. Macomber - Prior Cases

Prior Cases

In 1895, the Supreme Court had held in Pollock that a tax from income on property (unlike a tax on income from employment or vocations) needed to be proportionate to state population. In 1913, the United States ratified the Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which allowed taxation of income without regard to source (i.e., whether income from property or income from vocations and employment), and without regard to a state's population.

In 1918, the Court in Towne v. Eisner 245 U.S. 418 (1918) had addressed a nearly identical situation to one in Eisner v. Macomber. (Eisner was the person responsible for Internal Revenue Collection in both cases). However, in the aftermath of Towne v. Eisner, the U.S. Congress passed a revenue collection statute that specifically stated that stock dividends were to be counted as income.

Read more about this topic:  Eisner V. Macomber

Famous quotes containing the words prior and/or cases:

    Less smooth than her Skin and less white than her breast
    Was this pollisht stone beneath which she lyes prest
    Stop, Reader, and Sigh while thou thinkst on the rest

    With a just trim of Virtue her Soul was endu’d
    Not affectedly Pious nor secretly lewd,
    She cut even between the Cocquet and the Prude.
    —Matthew Prior (1664–1721)

    Only by being guilty of Folly does mortal man in many cases arrive at the perception of Sense. A thought which should forever free us from hasty imprecations upon our ever-recurring intervals of Folly; since though Folly be our teacher, Sense is the lesson she teaches; since, if Folly wholly depart from us, Further Sense will be her companion in the flight, and we will be left standing midway in wisdom.
    Herman Melville (1819–1891)