Education in Sri Lanka - Criticisms

Criticisms

Critics of the education system, including academics and parents, state that the education system is too competitive, too general, rigid, and elitist. Often, these criticisms state that there is little emphasis on creative thinking, unlike education systems in other societies, such as those in the United States. Those defending the current education system claim that Sri Lankan students have regularly ranked high when competing in international science and mathematics competitions and assessments, without any data or proven statistics to support these claims. Therefore critics argue that these claims are based on a few individual examples and not the case in general. They also claim that this is more an indication of students' skills in using rote to prepare for a certain style of competition or examination than of their ability to think critically.

The higher education field has been constantly criticized due to the falling standards at state universities which has led to high unemployed graduates. Efforts to establish private universities have been blocked, resulting in a very limited government sanctioned independent degree awarding institutions of international standard that have been claimed by proponents of private universities as a role model for the future, and claimed by opponents of private universities as privatization of education. However the demand for higher education has created several private institutions that conduct courses for degrees in foreign universities, these are not regulated or evaluated for proper standards by the government or independent organizations.

Read more about this topic:  Education In Sri Lanka

Famous quotes containing the word criticisms:

    The sway of alcohol over mankind is unquestionably due to its power to stimulate the mystical faculties of human nature, usually crushed to earth by the cold facts and dry criticisms of the sober hour. Sobriety diminishes, discriminates, and says no; drunkenness expands, unites, and says yes.
    William James (1842–1910)

    I have no concern with any economic criticisms of the communist system; I cannot enquire into whether the abolition of private property is expedient or advantageous. But I am able to recognize that the psychological premises on which the system is based are an untenable illusion. In abolishing private property we deprive the human love of aggression of one of its instruments ... but we have in no way altered the differences in power and influence which are misused by aggressiveness.
    Sigmund Freud (1856–1939)