Dual Objects
A group of dualities can be described by endowing, for any mathematical object X, the set of morphisms Hom(X, D) into some fixed object D, with a structure similar to the one of X. This is sometimes called internal Hom. In general, this yields a true duality only for specific choices of D, in which case X∗=Hom(X, D) is referred to as the dual of X. It may or may not be true that the bidual, that is to say, the dual of the dual, X∗∗ = (X∗)∗ is isomorphic to X, as the following example, which is underlying many other dualities, shows: the dual vector space V∗ of a K-vector space V is defined as
- V∗ = Hom (V, K).
The set of morphisms, i.e., linear maps, is a vector space in its own right. There is always a natural, injective map V → V∗∗ given by v ↦ (f ↦ f(v)), where f is an element of the dual space. That map is an isomorphism if and only if the dimension of V is finite.
In the realm of topological vector spaces, a similar construction exists, replacing the dual by the topological dual vector space. A topological vector space that is canonically isomorphic to its bidual is called reflexive space.
The dual lattice of a lattice L is given by
- Hom(L, Z),
which is used in the construction of toric varieties. The Pontryagin dual of locally compact topological groups G is given by
- Hom(G, S1),
continuous group homomorphisms with values in the circle (with multiplication of complex numbers as group operation).
Read more about this topic: Duality (mathematics)
Famous quotes containing the words dual and/or objects:
“Thee for my recitative,
Thee in the driving storm even as now, the snow, the winter-day
declining,
Thee in thy panoply, thy measurd dual throbbing and thy beat
convulsive,
Thy black cylindric body, golden brass and silvery steel,”
—Walt Whitman (18191892)
“Little minds mistake little objects for great ones, and lavish away upon the former that time and attention which only the latter deserve. To such mistakes we owe the numerous and frivolous tribe of insect-mongers, shell-mongers, and pursuers and driers of butterflies, etc. The strong mind distinguishes, not only between the useful and the useless, but likewise between the useful and the curious.”
—Philip Dormer Stanhope, 4th Earl Chesterfield (16941773)