The Double Variation in Beethoven
Although the double variation is associated strongly with Haydn, Elaine Sisman has pointed out that, provided we adopt a somewhat looser definition of the form, Ludwig van Beethoven also emerges as a major composer of double variations. With the partial exception of the Piano Trio in E flat major, Op. 70 No. 2, which Sisman sees as an homage to Haydn, Beethoven's double variations have a rather different character. For instance, sometimes only the A theme is strongly varied, with B remaining relatively constant. Beethoven also likes to interrupt or truncate one or both themes, producing a less regular structure than Haydn's, seen in the often-complex structural formulae given below.
Thus flexibly construed, the double variation emerges as the musical form for some of the most famous of Beethoven's works. Here is a list of movements for which Sisman argues that a double-variation structure is present.
Year |
Work |
Form |
A |
B |
1802 |
Third Symphony. 4: Allegro molto |
AA1A2BAxB1A3B2Ax1B3B4coda |
various, centered on E♭ |
various, centered on E♭ |
1808 |
Fifth Symphony. 2: Andante con moto |
ABA1B1A2, cadenza on A, B2 A3, coda based on A |
A♭/once in A♭ minor |
A♭-C, A♭-C, C |
1808 |
Piano Trio Op. 70, No. 2. 2: Allegretto |
AA1BA2B1 with coda |
C |
c |
1812 |
Seventh Symphony. 2: Allegretto |
AA1A2A3BA4, fugato on A, B1, coda based on A |
a |
A to C, A |
1824 |
Ninth Symphony. 3: Adagio molto e cantabile |
ABA1B1, episode on A, A2, episode1 on A, A3, episode2 on A, A3, coda |
B♭ |
D, then G |
1825 |
String Quartet No. 15, Op. 132. 3: Molto Adagio — Andante ("Heiliger Dankgesang") |
ABA1B1A2 |
F Lydian, notated C |
D |
As Sisman notes, Beethoven placed his double variations in the same genres as Haydn: the piano trio, the string quartet, and the symphony.
Read more about this topic: Double Variation
Famous quotes containing the words double and/or beethoven:
“In a symbol there is concealment and yet revelation: here therefore, by silence and by speech acting together, comes a double significance.... In the symbol proper, what we can call a symbol, there is ever, more or less distinctly and directly, some embodiment and revelation of the Infinite; the Infinite is made to blend itself with the Finite, to stand visible, and as it were, attainable there. By symbols, accordingly, is man guided and commanded, made happy, made wretched.”
—Thomas Carlyle (17951881)
“People whose sensibility is destroyed by music in trains, airports, lifts, cannot concentrate on a Beethoven quartet.”
—Witold Lutoslawski (b. 1913)