History of Divorce Law in Canada
There was no uniform federal divorce law in Canada until 1968. Instead, there was a patch-work of divorce laws in the different provinces, depending on the laws in force in each province at the time it joined Confederation:
- In the three Maritime provinces, divorce was governed by laws enacted by the colonial governments prior to Confederation in 1867;
- In the four western provinces and the northern territories, divorce was available under the English Matrimonial Causes Act, 1857, which was incorporated into their local law in 1870 under the principle of the reception of English statute laws in a colony;
- In Quebec and Newfoundland up to 1968, there was no divorce law. The only way for an individual to get divorced in these provinces was to apply to the federal Parliament for a private bill of divorce. These bills were primarily handled by the Canadian Senate where a special committee would undertake an investigation of a request for a divorce. If the committee found that the request had merit, the marriage would be dissolved by an Act of Parliament.
- In Ontario, prior to 1930 there was no divorce law and individuals seeking a divorce similarly had to apply to Parliament for a private bill of divorce. In 1930, Parliament passed the Divorce Act (Ontario) which authorised divorces in the courts of Ontario for Ontario residents.
In 1968, Parliament passed the first Divorce Act which established a uniform divorce law across Canada. The 1968 Act widened the reasons for divorce from adultery to include mental or physical cruelty, desertion, separation for three years or having an imprisoned spouse.
In 1986, Parliament passed a new Divorce Act to modernise the law of divorce further. One change made was to reduce the separation period to one year.
Read more about this topic: Divorce Act
Famous quotes containing the words history of, history, divorce, law and/or canada:
“There are two great unknown forces to-day, electricity and woman, but men can reckon much better on electricity than they can on woman.”
—Josephine K. Henry, U.S. suffragist. As quoted in History of Woman Suffrage, vol. 4, ch. 15, by Susan B. Anthony and Ida Husted Harper (1902)
“Books of natural history aim commonly to be hasty schedules, or inventories of God’s property, by some clerk. They do not in the least teach the divine view of nature, but the popular view, or rather the popular method of studying nature, and make haste to conduct the persevering pupil only into that dilemma where the professors always dwell.”
—Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)
“Children of the same family, the same blood, with the same first associations and habits, have some means of enjoyment in their power, which no subsequent connections can supply; and it must be by a long and unnatural estrangement, by a divorce which no subsequent connection can justify, if such precious remains of the earliest attachments are ever entirely outlived.”
—Jane Austen (1775–1817)
“The law is not a “light” for you or any man to see by; the law is not an instrument of any kind. The law is a causeway upon which so long as he keeps to it a citizen may walk safely.”
—Robert Bolt (1924–1995)
“In Canada an ordinary New England house would be mistaken for the château, and while every village here contains at least several gentlemen or “squires,” there is but one to a seigniory.”
—Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)