Rate of Dissolution
The rate of dissolution quantifies the speed of the dissolution process.
The rate of dissolution depends on:
- nature of the solvent and solute
- temperature (and to a small degree pressure)
- degree of undersaturation
- presence of mixing
- interfacial surface area
- presence of inhibitors (e.g., a substance adsorbed on the surface).
The rate of dissolution can be often expressed by the Noyes-Whitney Equation or the Nernst and Brunner equation of the form:
where:
- m - amount of dissolved material, kg
- t - time, seconds
- A - surface area of the interface between the dissolving substance and the solvent, m2
- D - diffusion coefficient, m2/s
- d - thickness of the boundary layer of the solvent at the surface of the dissolving substance, m
- Cs - concentration of the substance on the surface, kg/m3
- Cb - concentration of the substance in the bulk of the solvent, kg/m3
For dissolution limited by diffusion, Cs is equal to the solubility of the substance.
When the dissolution rate of a pure substance is normalized to the surface area of the solid (which usually changes with time during the dissolution process), then it is expressed in kg/m2s and referred to as "intrinsic dissolution rate". The intrinsic dissolution rate is defined by the United States Pharmacopeia.
Dissolution rates vary by orders of magnitude between different systems. Typically, very low dissolution rates parallel low solubilities, and substances with high solubilities exhibit high dissolution rates, as suggested by the Noyes-Whitney equation. However, this is not a rule.
Read more about this topic: Dissolution (chemistry)
Famous quotes containing the words rate of, rate and/or dissolution:
“We all run on two clocks. One is the outside clock, which ticks away our decades and brings us ceaselessly to the dry season. The other is the inside clock, where you are your own timekeeper and determine your own chronology, your own internal weather and your own rate of living. Sometimes the inner clock runs itself out long before the outer one, and you see a dead man going through the motions of living.”
—Max Lerner (b. 1902)
“As a novelist, I cannot occupy myself with “characters,” or at any rate central ones, who lack panache, in one or another sense, who would be incapable of a major action or a major passion, or who have not a touch of the ambiguity, the ultimate unaccountability, the enlarging mistiness of persons “in history.” History, as more austerely I now know it, is not romantic. But I am.”
—Elizabeth Bowen (1899–1973)
“The most dangerous aspect of present-day life is the dissolution of the feeling of individual responsibility. Mass solitude has done away with any difference between the internal and the external, between the intellectual and the physical.”
—Eugenio Montale (1896–1981)