DFA As A Transition Monoid
Alternatively a run can be seen as a sequence of compositions of transition function with itself. Given an input symbol, one may write the transition function as, using the simple trick of currying, that is, writing for all . This way, the transition function can be seen in simpler terms: it's just something that "acts" on a state in Q, yielding another state. One may then consider the result of function composition repeatedly applied to the various functions, and so on. Using this notion we define . Given a pair of letters, one may define a new function, by insisting that, where denotes function composition. Clearly, this process can be recursively continued. So, we have following recursive definition
- where is empty string and
- where and .
is defined for all words . Repeated function composition forms a monoid. For the transition functions, this monoid is known as the transition monoid, or sometimes the transformation semigroup. The construction can also be reversed: given a, one can reconstruct a, and so the two descriptions are equivalent.
Read more about this topic: Deterministic Finite Automaton
Famous quotes containing the word transition:
“There is not any present moment that is unconnected with some future one. The life of every man is a continued chain of incidents, each link of which hangs upon the former. The transition from cause to effect, from event to event, is often carried on by secret steps, which our foresight cannot divine, and our sagacity is unable to trace. Evil may at some future period bring forth good; and good may bring forth evil, both equally unexpected.”
—Joseph Addison (16721719)