Definition
Let be an abelian category. We obtain the derived category in several steps:
- The basic object is the category of chain complexes in . Its objects will be the objects of the derived category but its morphisms will be altered.
- Pass to the homotopy category of chain complexes by identifying morphisms which are chain homotopic.
- Pass to the derived category by localizing at the set of quasi-isomorphisms. Morphisms in the derived category may be explicitly described as roofs, where s is a quasi-isomorphism and f is any morphism of chain complexes.
The second step may be bypassed since a homotopy equivalence is in particular a quasi-isomorphism. But then the simple roof definition of morphisms must be replaced by a more complicated one using finite strings of morphisms (technically, it is no longer a calculus of fractions), and the triangulated category structure of arises in the homotopy category. So the one step construction is more efficient in a way but more complicated and the result is less powerful.
Read more about this topic: Derived Category
Famous quotes containing the word definition:
“It is very hard to give a just definition of love. The most we can say of it is this: that in the soul, it is a desire to rule; in the spirit, it is a sympathy; and in the body, it is but a hidden and subtle desire to possess—after many mysteries—what one loves.”
—François, Duc De La Rochefoucauld (1613–1680)
“The definition of good prose is proper words in their proper places; of good verse, the most proper words in their proper places. The propriety is in either case relative. The words in prose ought to express the intended meaning, and no more; if they attract attention to themselves, it is, in general, a fault.”
—Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1772–1834)
“Beauty, like all other qualities presented to human experience, is relative; and the definition of it becomes unmeaning and useless in proportion to its abstractness. To define beauty not in the most abstract, but in the most concrete terms possible, not to find a universal formula for it, but the formula which expresses most adequately this or that special manifestation of it, is the aim of the true student of aesthetics.”
—Walter Pater (1839–1894)