Democratic peace theory (or simply the "democratic peace") is the theory that democracies do not go to war with each other. In contrast to theories explaining war, it is a "Theory Of Peace".
Some have preferred terms like "mutual democratic pacifism" or "inter-democracy nonaggression hypothesis" for the theory, to clarify that it is not the peace itself that is democratic, but rather the countries involved.
Among proponents of the theory, several explanations have been offered for it:
- that democratic leaders must answer to the voters for war, and therefore have an incentive to seek alternatives;
- that such statesmen have practice settling matters by discussion, not by arms, and do the same in foreign policy;
- that democracies view non-democracies or their people as threatening, and go to war with them over issues which would have been settled peacefully between democracies;
- that democracies tend to be wealthier than other countries, and the wealthy tend to avoid war, having more to lose.
- Physicist turned historian Spencer R. Weart disagrees with this, saying, "It is not because of their advanced economic developmentâwealthy countries fight wars about as often as poor ones."
Among those who dispute the theory, there are also several opinions: that the claim is a statistical artifact, explicable by chance; and that definitions of democracy and war can be deliberately cherry-picked to show a pattern that may not be there.
Read more about Democratic Peace Theory: History, Definitions, Possible Exceptions, Statistical Difficulties Due To Newness of Democracy, Conflict Initiation, Internal Violence and Genocide, Explanations, Criticism, Academic Relevance and Derived Studies, Influence
Famous quotes containing the words democratic, peace and/or theory:
“That’s free enterprise, friends: freedom to gamble, freedom to lose. And the great thing—the truly democratic thing about it—is that you don’t even have to be a player to lose.”
—Barbara Ehrenreich (b. 1941)
“It must be a peace without victory.... Victory would mean peace forced upon the losers, a victor’s terms imposed upon the vanquished. It would be accepted in humiliation, under duress, at an intolerable sacrifice, and would leave a sting, a resentment, a bitter memory upon which the terms of peace would rest, not permanently, but only as upon quicksand.”
—Woodrow Wilson (1856–1924)
“No one thinks anything silly is suitable when they are an adolescent. Such an enormous share of their own behavior is silly that they lose all proper perspective on silliness, like a baker who is nauseated by the sight of his own eclairs. This provides another good argument for the emerging theory that the best use of cryogenics is to freeze all human beings when they are between the ages of twelve and nineteen.”
—Anna Quindlen (20th century)