DARPA Grand Challenge - Technology

Technology

2007 Urban Challenge teams employed a variety of different software and hardware combinations for interpreting sensor data, planning, and execution. Some examples:

Team Language(s) OS Hardware Notes
Cornell C++, C# 17 dual-core servers Planning involved Bayesian mathematics. In 2008, Cornell released the full source code under Apache License 2.0.
Insight Racing Linux Mac Mini Mac Minis run on DC power at relatively low power and produce less heat.
Team Case Mostly LabVIEW, some C++ and MATLAB Windows XP 5 Mac Minis, 2 NI PXI's, CompactRIO Mac Minis running on DC power with solid state drives. PXI's for sensor interfaces. CompactRIO for real-time vehicle controller. Biologically-inspired software architecture.
Team Gray GrayMatter, Inc. AVS. Embedded hardware system was considerably smaller than that of other teams. Also, the system allows possible expansion with other sensors.
Team LUX Windows XP embedded version of XP
Team Jefferson Java Solaris (Java RTS), Linux (Java SE) micro-controllers and Sun SPOT (Java ME) On Perrone Robotics' MAX robotics platform atop Sun Microsystems' Java RTS/SE/ME.
Team Ben Franklin MATLAB
Sting Racing Java Linux
VictorTango a mixture of C++ and LabVIEW Windows and Linux
Team Gator Nation (CIMAR) C, C++, and C# Windows, Fedora (Linux) systems communication with the JAUS protocol.
MIT C Linux cluster with 40 cores The robotic middleware library Lightweight Communications and Marshaling (LCM) was developed for the MIT vehicle.
Austin Robot Technology C++ software was written and developed by undergraduates from a UT-Austin course. Used the Player Project as an infrastructure.
Tartan Racing (winner) Employed a hierarchical control system, with layered mission planning, motion planning, behavior generation, perception, world modelling, and mechatronics.

Read more about this topic:  DARPA Grand Challenge

Famous quotes containing the word technology:

    The successor to politics will be propaganda. Propaganda, not in the sense of a message or ideology, but as the impact of the whole technology of the times.
    Marshall McLuhan (1911–1980)

    If we had a reliable way to label our toys good and bad, it would be easy to regulate technology wisely. But we can rarely see far enough ahead to know which road leads to damnation. Whoever concerns himself with big technology, either to push it forward or to stop it, is gambling in human lives.
    Freeman Dyson (b. 1923)