Cost-plus Pricing - Reasons For Wide Use

Reasons For Wide Use

Firms vary greatly in size, product range, product characteristics etc. Firms also face different degrees of competition in markets for their products. So, a clear explanation cannot be given for the widespread use of cost-plus pricing. However the following points explain as to why this approach is widely used:

  • Even if a firm handles many products, this approach provides the means by which fair prices can be found easily
  • This approach involves calculation of full cost. Prices based on full cost look factual and precise and may be more defensible on moral grounds than prices established by other means
  • This approach reduces the cost of decision-making. Firms which prefer stability use cost-plus pricing as a guide to price products in an uncertain market where knowledge is incomplete
  • Firms are never too sure about the shape of their demand curve neither are they very sure about the probable response to any price change. So, it becomes risky for a firm to move away from cost-plus pricing
  • Unknown reaction of rivals to the set price is a major uncertainty. When products and production processes are similar competitive stability is achieved by usage of cost-plus pricing. This competitive stability is achieved by setting a price that is likely to yield acceptable returns to other members of the industry
  • Management tends to know more about product costs than any other factors which can be used to price a product
  • Insures seller against unpredictable, or unexpected later costs
  • Ethical advantages (see just price)
  • Simplicity
  • Ready availability
  • Price increases can be justified in terms of cost increases

Read more about this topic:  Cost-plus Pricing

Famous quotes containing the words reasons for, reasons and/or wide:

    One of the reasons for the failure of feminism to dislodge deeply held perceptions of male and female behaviour was its insistence that women were victims, and men powerful patriarchs, which made a travesty of ordinary people’s experience of the mutual interdependence of men and women.
    Rosalind Coward (b. 1953)

    “... But if you shrink from being scared,
    What would you say to war if it should come?
    That’s what for reasons I should like to know
    If you can comfort me by any answer.”
    “Oh, but war’s not for children it’s for men.”
    Robert Frost (1874–1963)

    [In early adolescence] she becomes acutely aware of herself as a being perceived by others, judged by others, though she herself is the harshest judge, quick to list her physical flaws, quick to undervalue and under-rate herself not only in terms of physical appearance but across a wide range of talents, capacities and even social status, whereas boys of the same age will cite their abilities, their talents and their social status pretty accurately.
    Terri Apter (20th century)