Corpus-assisted Discourse Studies - Research Questions and Techniques of Analysis

Research Questions and Techniques of Analysis

CADS research projects often focus on research questions of the following types:

Given that P is a discourse participant (or possibly an institution) and G is a goal, often a political goal:

(i) How does P achieve G with language?

(ii) What does this tell us about P?

(iii) Comparative studies: how do P1 and P2 differ in their use of language? Does this tell us anything about their different principles and objectives?

A second general type of CADS research question, which might be asked of interactive discourse data, is the following.

Given that P(x) is a particular participant or set of participants, DT is the discourse type, and R is an observed relationship between or among participants:

How do {P(a), P(b)…P(n)} achieve / maintain R in DT ?

Another common type of research question open to investigation using CADS techniques is the following:

Given that A is an author, Ph(x) is a phenomenon or practice or behaviour, and DT(x) is a particular discourse type.

A has said P(x) is the case in DT(a)

Is Ph(x) the case in DT(b)

This is a classic “hypothesis-testing” research question: we test the hypothesis that whatever practice has been observed by a previous author in some discourse type will be observable in another. It is a process we might call para-replication, that is, the replication of an experiment with either a fresh set of texts of the same discourse type or of a related discourse type, “in order to see whether were an artefact of one single data set” (Stubbs 2001: 124).

A final example of research question which may usefully be investigated using CADS techniques is of the following sort.

Given that P(x) is a participant or category thereof, and LF(x) is a particular language feature:

Do {P(a)} and {P(b)} use LF(x) in the same way?

Such research aims to ascertain whether different participants use a particular linguistic feature in the same or different ways. The research may proceed to attempt to explain why this is the case.

Read more about this topic:  Corpus-assisted Discourse Studies

Famous quotes containing the words research, questions, techniques and/or analysis:

    The research on gender and morality shows that women and men looked at the world through very different moral frameworks. Men tend to think in terms of “justice” or absolute “right and wrong,” while women define morality through the filter of how relationships will be affected. Given these basic differences, why would men and women suddenly agree about disciplining children?
    Ron Taffel (20th century)

    In fact, now I come to think of it, do we decide questions, at all? We decide answers, no doubt: but surely the questions decide us? It is the dog, you know, that wags the tail—not the tail that wags the dog.
    Lewis Carroll [Charles Lutwidge Dodgson] (1832–1898)

    It is easy to lose confidence in our natural ability to raise children. The true techniques for raising children are simple: Be with them, play with them, talk to them. You are not squandering their time no matter what the latest child development books say about “purposeful play” and “cognitive learning skills.”
    Neil Kurshan (20th century)

    Analysis as an instrument of enlightenment and civilization is good, in so far as it shatters absurd convictions, acts as a solvent upon natural prejudices, and undermines authority; good, in other words, in that it sets free, refines, humanizes, makes slaves ripe for freedom. But it is bad, very bad, in so far as it stands in the way of action, cannot shape the vital forces, maims life at its roots. Analysis can be a very unappetizing affair, as much so as death.
    Thomas Mann (1875–1955)