Uses of Content Analysis
Ole Holsti (1969) groups 15 uses of content analysis into three basic categories:
- make inferences about the antecedents of a communication
- describe and make inferences about characteristics of a communication
- make inferences about the effects of a communication.
He also places these uses into the context of the basic communication paradigm.
The following table shows fifteen uses of content analysis in terms of their general purpose, element of the communication paradigm to which they apply, and the general question they are intended to answer.
Uses of Content Analysis by Purpose, Communication Element, and Question | ||||
Purpose | Element | Question | Use | |
Make inferences about the antecedents of communications | Source | Who? |
|
|
Encoding process | Why? |
|
||
Describe & make inferences about the characteristics of communications | Channel | How? |
|
|
Message | What? |
|
||
Recipient | To whom? |
|
||
Make inferences about the consequences of communications | Decoding process | With what effect? |
|
|
Note. Purpose, communication element, & question from Holsti (1969). Uses primarily from Berelson (1952) as adapted by Holsti (1969). |
Read more about this topic: Content Analysis
Famous quotes containing the words content and/or analysis:
“The root of the discontent in American women is that they are too well educated.... There will be no real content among American women unless they are made and kept more ignorant or unless they are given equal opportunity with men to use what they have been taught. And American men will not be really happy until their women are.”
—Pearl S. Buck (18921973)
“Analysis as an instrument of enlightenment and civilization is good, in so far as it shatters absurd convictions, acts as a solvent upon natural prejudices, and undermines authority; good, in other words, in that it sets free, refines, humanizes, makes slaves ripe for freedom. But it is bad, very bad, in so far as it stands in the way of action, cannot shape the vital forces, maims life at its roots. Analysis can be a very unappetizing affair, as much so as death.”
—Thomas Mann (18751955)