History
CONAIE was founded at a convention of some 500 indigenous representatives on November 13-November 16, 1986.
Initially explicitly rejecting the use of the electoral process, CONAIE developed an economic and political strategy to redefine and implement participatory democracy. Simultaneously, CONAIE called for the conversion of Ecuador into a multi-nation state recognizing the national autonomy of 12 indigenous nations, run by "popular parliaments".
Throughout the 1990s, CONAIE repeatedly mobilized thousands of indigenous campesinos to shut down Quito, clogging the streets with traditional dance, art and song while making demands of the political structure via direct negotiation. These protests often came in response to International Monetary Fund (IMF) policies.
CONAIE adopted a programme with these 16 demands:
- A public declaration that Ecuador is a plurinational country (to be ratified by the constitution)
- The government must grant lands and titles to lands to the nationalities
- Solutions to water and irrigation needs
- Absolution of indigenous debts to FODERUMA and the National Development Bank
- Freezing of consumer prices
- Conclusion of priority projects in Indian communities
- Nonpayment of rural land taxes
- Expulsion of the Summer Institute of Linguistics
- Free commercial handicraft activities
- CONAIE protection of archaeological sites
- Officialization of Indian medicine
- Cancellation of government decree that created parallel land-reform granting bodies
- The government should immediately grant funds to the nationalities
- The government should grant funds for bilingual education
- Respect for the rights of the child
- The fixing of fair prices for products
Read more about this topic: Confederation Of Indigenous Nationalities Of Ecuador
Famous quotes containing the word history:
“We don’t know when our name came into being or how some distant ancestor acquired it. We don’t understand our name at all, we don’t know its history and yet we bear it with exalted fidelity, we merge with it, we like it, we are ridiculously proud of it as if we had thought it up ourselves in a moment of brilliant inspiration.”
—Milan Kundera (b. 1929)
“The one duty we owe to history is to rewrite it.”
—Oscar Wilde (1854–1900)
“To summarize the contentions of this paper then. Firstly, the phrase ‘the meaning of a word’ is a spurious phrase. Secondly and consequently, a re-examination is needed of phrases like the two which I discuss, ‘being a part of the meaning of’ and ‘having the same meaning.’ On these matters, dogmatists require prodding: although history indeed suggests that it may sometimes be better to let sleeping dogmatists lie.”
—J.L. (John Langshaw)