Complete Homogeneous Symmetric Polynomial - Definition

Definition

The complete homogeneous symmetric polynomial of degree k in variables X1, ..., Xn, written hk for k = 0, 1, 2, ..., is the sum of all monomials of total degree k in the variables. Formally,

The formula can also be written as:

h_k (X_1, X_2, \dots,X_n) = \sum_{l_1+l_2+ \cdots + l_n=k; ~~ l_i \geq 0 } X_{1}^{l_1} X_{2}^{l_2} \cdots X_{n}^{l_n}.

Indeed, lp is just multiplicity of p in sequence ik.

The first few of these polynomials are

Thus, for each nonnegative integer, there exists exactly one complete homogeneous symmetric polynomial of degree in variables.

Another way of rewriting the definition is to take summation over all sequences ik, without condition of ordering :

h_k (X_1, X_2, \dots,X_n) = \sum_{1 \leq i_1, i_2, \cdots, i_k \leq n} \frac{m_1! m_2 !...m_n!}{k!} X_{i_1} X_{i_2} \cdots X_{i_k},

here mp is the multiplicity of number p in the sequence ik.

For example

The polynomial ring formed by taking all integral linear combinations of products of the complete homogeneous symmetric polynomials is a commutative ring.

Read more about this topic:  Complete Homogeneous Symmetric Polynomial

Famous quotes containing the word definition:

    “The man who knows governments most completely is he who troubles himself least about a definition which shall give their essence. Enjoying an intimate acquaintance with all their particularities in turn, he would naturally regard an abstract conception in which these were unified as a thing more misleading than enlightening.”
    —William James (1842–1910)

    “... if, as women, we accept a philosophy of history that asserts that women are by definition assimilated into the male universal, that we can understand our past through a male lens—if we are unaware that women even have a history—we live our lives similarly unanchored, drifting in response to a veering wind of myth and bias.”
    —Adrienne Rich (b. 1929)

    “Beauty, like all other qualities presented to human experience, is relative; and the definition of it becomes unmeaning and useless in proportion to its abstractness. To define beauty not in the most abstract, but in the most concrete terms possible, not to find a universal formula for it, but the formula which expresses most adequately this or that special manifestation of it, is the aim of the true student of aesthetics.”
    —Walter Pater (1839–1894)