Differences Between Standard Pascal and Delphi
1. The way procedures and functions can be passed as parameters differs: Delphi requires explicit procedural types to be declared where Standard Pascal does not.
2. Delphi does not support so called 'intraprocedural gotos', in which goto statements may reference targets outside the current procedure/function body.
3. Standard Pascal has file 'buffer variables', together with 'get' and 'put' standard procedures that operate on them. Neither are supported in Delphi.
4. Given a variant record in Standard Pascal, the size of a particular variant can be specified. Delphi does not support this form of 'sized' dynamic variable allocation:
new(p, t) //where t is a variant record tag type; does not compile in Delphi5. The functions 'pack' and 'unpack' are not implemented in Delphi.
6. The Delphi compiler does not treat { and (*, } and *) as synonyms like Standard Pascal requires. In other words,
{ comment *)is not valid in Delphi. Instead, Delphi uses the scheme of allowing the different comment types to indicate nested comments.
7. Delphi does not replace eoln with space as the Pascal standard requires. When reading through the end of a line, the eoln character is supposed to be replaced with a space in ISO 7185. Instead, reading through eoln in Delphi gives the character code for carriage return (13), followed by line feed (10).
8. Numbers and booleans are not printed out in their 'default' field widths by Delphi's version of the Write and WriteLn standard procedures, being instead printed in the minimum amount of space. For example, in Delphi,
write(5); write(55);is equivalent to:
write(5:1); write(55:2);However, Standard Pascal requires it to be equivalent to the following (TotalWidth is implementation-defined):
write(5:TotalWidth); write(55:TotalWidth);Similarly, for booleans,
write(false); write(true);is equivalent to
write('false':5); write('true':4);in Delphi, but
write('false':TotalWidth); write('true':TotalWidth);in ISO 7185.
9. Temporary files are not supported by Delphi using traditional Pascal I/O - executing Reset or Rewrite results in an error, where under Standard Pascal it opens a temporary file that exists for the duration of the program before being automatically deleted.
10. Notwithstanding the fact Delphi still allows using much of the traditional Pascal RTL, Delphi-specific library functionality is generally implemented in ordinary Delphi code that uses, rather than adds to, compiler-provided intrinsics. This philosophy contrasts to Standard Pascal, whose RTL must be provided by the compiler. For example, in Standard Pascal, the 'file' type is an intrinsic type - sort of like a record, but another compiler-defined type alongside records. In contrast, the TFileStream class in Delphi is an ordinary Delphi class written in ordinary Delphi code. Similarly, the Read, ReadLn, Write and WriteLn standard procedures have signatures that are not themselves legal Pascal signatures. While Delphi still implements them, only vary rarely do Delphi-specific RTL routines require similarly special handling: rather, the language was evolved to include features such as 'open arrays', default parameters and procedural overloading that can be used by user-written routines too.
Read more about this topic: Comparison Of Pascal And Delphi
Famous quotes containing the words differences between, differences, standard, pascal and/or delphi:
“The extent to which a parent is able to see a childs world through that childs eyes depends very much on the parents ability to appreciate the differences between herself and her child and to respect those differences. Your own children need you to accept them for who they are, not who you would like them to be.”
—Lawrence Balter (20th century)
“What strikes many twin researchers now is not how much identical twins are alike, but rather how different they are, given the same genetic makeup....Multiples dont walk around in lockstep, talking in unison, thinking identical thoughts. The bond for normal twins, whether they are identical or fraternal, is based on how they, as individuals who are keenly aware of the differences between them, learn to relate to one another.”
—Pamela Patrick Novotny (20th century)
“I find it interesting that the meanest life, the poorest existence, is attributed to Gods will, but as human beings become more affluent, as their living standard and style begin to ascend the material scale, God descends the scale of responsibility at a commensurate speed.”
—Maya Angelou (b. 1928)
“Does he who loves someone on account of beauty really love that person? No, for smallpox, which will kill beauty without killing the person, will cause him to love the person no more. And if one loves me for my judgment, for my memory, he does not love me, for I can lose these qualities without losing myself. Where, then, is this myself, if it be neither in the body nor in the soul?”
—Blaise Pascal (16231662)
“At Delphi I prayed
to Apollo
that he maintain in me
the flame of the poem
and I drank of the brackish
spring there....”
—Denise Levertov (b. 1923)