Associated Research Approaches and Methods
The study of communicative ecologies is commonly associated with a research approach known as ethnographic action research. This approach combines ethnographic methods, including participant observation and in-depth interviews, with participatory methods and action research. The ethnographic methods enable researchers to develop a rich understanding of the meanings derived from media and communication technologies. The action research methods allow the study to be located in not only communication theory, but also grassroots communication practice. In this approach, participants can act as co-investigators in cycles of inquiry, action and reflection and researchers are able to give back in a way that will develop the communicative ecology. In this way, ethnographic action research is suited to both research and project development agendas (Tacchi, 2006).
Research approaches used to date include:
- ethnographic action research (Tacchi, Hearn & Ninan, 2004;Tacchi et al., 2003) (Tacchi et al., 2007)
- participatory action research (Reason & Bradbury, 2001)
- participatory design (Greenbaum & King, 1991;Schuler & Namioka, 1993)
- network action research (Foth, 2006)
Methods related to these approaches include:
- observation
- participant observation
- field notes
- in-depth interviews
- focus groups and group interviews
- media-use diaries and other forms self-documentation
- documents and other artefacts
- content analysis
- questionnaires and surveys
- participant feedback
- cultural probes
- scenarios
- personae/archetypes
- sound mapping
- concept mapping exercises
- participatory design activities
Read more about this topic: Communicative Ecology
Famous quotes containing the words research, approaches and/or methods:
“If politics is the art of the possible, research is surely the art of the soluble. Both are immensely practical-minded affairs.”
—Peter B. Medawar (1915–1987)
“I should say that the most prominent scientific men of our country, and perhaps of this age, are either serving the arts and not pure science, or are performing faithful but quite subordinate labors in particular departments. They make no steady and systematic approaches to the central fact.... There is wanting constant and accurate observation with enough of theory to direct and discipline it. But, above all, there is wanting genius.”
—Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)
“How can you tell if you discipline effectively? Ask yourself if your disciplinary methods generally produce lasting results in a manner you find acceptable. Whether your philosophy is democratic or autocratic, whatever techniques you use—reasoning, a “star” chart, time-outs, or spanking—if it doesn’t work, it’s not effective.”
—Stanley Turecki (20th century)