Methods of Proof
There have been many methods of attack on the problem. For example, let A and B be integers, A being how many times the "3n+1" rule is used in a cycle, and B being how many times the "n/2" rule is used. Let x be the lowest number in a cycle then, regardless of what order the rules are used, we have:
where C is the "excess" caused by the "+1" in the rule, and can be shown to be bigger than:
using geometric progression. Rearranging shows that the lowest number in the cycle satisfies:
which gives a lower bound for the lowest number in a cycle for a given cycle length. For large cycles the fraction 3A/2B would be expected to tend to 1, so that the lower bound would be large.
Read more about this topic: Collatz Conjecture
Famous quotes containing the words methods of, methods and/or proof:
“All men are equally proud. The only difference is that not all take the same methods of showing it.”
—François, Duc De La Rochefoucauld (1613–1680)
“All men are equally proud. The only difference is that not all take the same methods of showing it.”
—François, Duc De La Rochefoucauld (1613–1680)
“The thing with Catholicism, the same as all religions, is that it teaches what should be, which seems rather incorrect. This is “what should be.” Now, if you’re taught to live up to a “what should be” that never existed—only an occult superstition, no proof of this “should be”Mthen you can sit on a jury and indict easily, you can cast the first stone, you can burn Adolf Eichmann, like that!”
—Lenny Bruce (1925–1966)