Clearing The Neighbourhood - Details

Details

The phrase refers to an orbiting body (a planet or protoplanet) "sweeping out" its orbital region over time, by gravitationally interacting with smaller bodies nearby. Over many orbital cycles, a large body will tend to cause small bodies either to accrete with it, or to be disturbed to another orbit, or to be captured either as a satellite or into a resonant orbit. As a consequence it does not then share its orbital region with other bodies of significant size, except for its own satellites, or other bodies governed by its own gravitational influence. This latter restriction excludes objects whose orbits may cross but which will never collide with each other due to orbital resonance, such as Jupiter and the Trojan asteroids, Earth and 3753 Cruithne, or Neptune and the plutinos.

In their paper, Stern and Levison sought an algorithm to determine which "planetary bodies control the region surrounding them". They defined Λ (lambda), a measure of a body's ability to scatter smaller masses out of its orbital region over a long period of time. Λ is defined mathematically as

where M is the mass of the body, a is the length of the body's semi-major axis, and k is a function of the orbital elements of the small body being scattered and the degree to which it must be scattered. In the domain of the solar planetary disc, there is little variation in the average values of k for small bodies at a particular distance from the Sun.

If Λ > 1, then the body will likely clear out the small bodies in its orbital zone. Stern and Levison used this discriminant to separate the gravitionally rounded, Sun-orbiting bodies into überplanets, which are "dynamically important enough to have cleared its neighboring planetesimals", and unterplanets. The überplanets are the eight most massive solar orbiters (i.e., the IAU planets), and the unterplanets are the rest (i.e., the IAU dwarf planets).

Steven Soter proposed an observationally based measure µ (mu), which he called the "planetary discriminant", to separate bodies orbiting stars into planets and non-planets. Per Soter, two bodies are defined to share an orbital zone if their orbits cross a common radial distance from the primary, and their non-resonant periods differ by less than an order of magnitude. The order-of-magnitude similarity in period requirement excludes comets from the calculation, but the combined mass of the comets turns out to be negligible compared to the other small Solar System bodies, so their inclusion would have little impact on the results. µ is then calculated by dividing the mass of the candidate body by the total mass of the other objects that share its orbital zone. It is a measure of the actual degree of cleanliness of the orbital zone. Soter proposed that if µ > 100, then the candidate body be regarded as a planet.

Here is a list of planets and dwarf planets ranked by Soter's planetary discriminant µ, in decreasing order. Note that for all eight planets defined by the IAU, µ is orders of magnitude greater than 100, while for all dwarf planets, µ is orders of magnitude less than 100. Also listed is the Stern–Levison parameter Λ; again, the planets are orders of magnitude greater than 1, and the dwarf planets are orders of magnitude less than 1. The scattering power relative to Earth (Λ/ΛE) is also shown, as is the distance where Λ = 1 (where the body would change from a planet to a dwarf planet).

Rank Name Soter's Planetary
discriminant µ
Stern–Levison
parameter Λ
Mass (kg) Type of object Λ/ΛE Λ = 1 distance (au)
1 Earth 1700000 !1.7 × 106 0000153000 !1.53 × 105 0005973600 !5.9736 × 1024 3rd planet 0001.00 !1.00 70032870000000000002,870
2 Venus 1350000 !1.35 × 106 0000166000 !1.66 × 105 0004868500 !4.8685 × 1024 2nd planet 0001.08 !1.08 70032180000000000002,180
3 Jupiter 0625000 !6.25 × 105 1300000000 !1.30 × 109 1898600000 !1.8986 × 1027 5th planet 8510 !8510 70066220000000000006,220,000
4 Saturn 0190000 !1.9 × 105 0046800000 !4.68 × 107 0568460000 !5.6846 × 1026 6th planet 0308 !308 70061250000000000001,250,000
5 Mars 0180000 !1.8 × 105 0000000942 !9.42 × 102 0000641850 !6.4185 × 1023 4th planet 0000.0061 !0.0061 7002146000000000000146
6 Mercury 0091000 !9.1 × 104 0000001950 !1.95 × 103 0000330220 !3.3022 × 1023 1st planet 0000.0126 !0.0126 700160000000000000060
7 Uranus 0029000 !2.9 × 104 0000384000 !3.84 × 105 0086832000 !8.6832 × 1025 7th planet 0002.51 !2.51 7005102000000000000102,000
8 Neptune 0024000 !2.4 × 104 0000273000 !2.73 × 105 0102430000 !1.0243 × 1026 8th planet 0001.79 !1.79 7005127000000000000127,000
9 Ceres 0000000.33 !0.33 0000000000.000832 !8.32 × 10−4 0000000943 !9.43 × 1020 dwarf planet 0000.0000000087 !8.7 × 10−9 69982450000000000000.0245
10 Eris 0000000.10 !0.10 0000000000.00215 !2.15 × 10−3 0000016700 !1.67 × 1022 dwarf planet 0000.0000000133 !1.33 × 10−8 70001129900000999991.13
11 Pluto 0000000.077 !0.077 0000000000.00295 !2.95 × 10−3 0000012900 !1.29 × 1022 dwarf planet 0000.0000000195 !1.95 × 10−8 69998120000000000000.812
12 Makemake 0000000.02 !0.02 0000000000.000222 !2.22 × 10−4 0000004000 !~4 × 1021 dwarf planet 0000.00000000145 !1.45 × 10−9 69991680000000000000.168
13 Haumea 0000000.02 !0.02 0000000000.000268 !2.68 × 10−4 0000004200 !4.2 ± 0.1 × 1021 dwarf planet 0000.00000000172 !1.72 × 10−9 69991790000000000000.179

Read more about this topic:  Clearing The Neighbourhood

Famous quotes containing the word details:

    Then he told the news media
    the strange details of his death
    and they hammered him up in the marketplace
    and sold him and sold him and sold him.
    My death the same.
    Anne Sexton (1928–1974)

    Different persons growing up in the same language are like different bushes trimmed and trained to take the shape of identical elephants. The anatomical details of twigs and branches will fulfill the elephantine form differently from bush to bush, but the overall outward results are alike.
    Willard Van Orman Quine (b. 1908)

    Working women today are trying to achieve in the work world what men have achieved all along—but men have always had the help of a woman at home who took care of all the other details of living! Today the working woman is also that woman at home, and without support services in the workplace and a respect for the work women do within and outside the home, the attempt to do both is taking its toll—on women, on men, and on our children.
    Jeanne Elium (20th century)