Circus (Britney Spears Album) - Critical Reception

Critical Reception

At Metacritic, which assigns a normalized rating out of 100 to reviews from mainstream critics, Circus received an average score of 64, based on 22 reviews, indicating "generally favorable reviews". Genevieve Koski of The A.V. Club noted that Spears "reaches the highest heights of shiny dance music" when accompanied by her tracks' elaborate productions. Rolling Stone's Caryn Ganz opined that the album could have been a satisfactory successor to her fourth album In the Zone (2003). The New York Times felt that Circus contained "crisp" material that incorporated "catchy melodic interludes". Robert Christgau gave the album a two-star honorable mention, stating that it was "still fun more often than not". Nick Levine of Digital Spy identified the record as a sequel to Blackout (2007) and recognized an increasingly "confident" Spears that used less synthesizers in the music's production.

Stephen Thomas Erlewine of Allmusic provided a mixed review, commenting that the title recognized that "things got a little tough" following the release of Blackout. Alexis Petridis of The Guardian's Alexis Petridis felt that Circus was "substantially less edgy and exciting than its predecessor". Slant Magazine's Eric Henderson suggested that the album's "self-actualization" gave off a "hollow" feel through the majority of the record. Hamish MacBain of NME felt that Spears's vocals lacked progression from "the Mouseketeer who brought us ...Baby One More Time". Los Angeles Times's Ann Powers criticized the lack of lyrical depth and named "Unusual You" as a stand-out track for featuring a maturer meaning.