Purpose
In the United States, character evidence may be offered at trial to
- 1. prove character, if character is a substantive issue in the litigation
- admissibility of character evidence to prove character is not affected by the case's civil or criminal nature
- admissibility of character evidence to prove character is not affected by the case's civil or criminal nature
- 2. prove, through circumstantial evidence, an aspect of an individual's conduct
- character evidence's admissibility as circumstantial evidence is influenced by the case's civil or criminal nature
- character evidence's admissibility as circumstantial evidence is influenced by the case's civil or criminal nature
- 3. impeach or strengthen the credibility of a witness
Character may be a substantive issue in defamation suits, in lawsuits alleging negligent hiring or negligent entrustment, in child custody cases, as well as in loss of consortium cases; character evidence is thus admissible to prove the substantive issues that arise in these types of lawsuits.
If used as circumstantial evidence, FRE 404(a)(1) renders inadmissible character evidence offered to prove that an individual acted "in accordance with" a character or trait "on a particular occasion." It lists several exceptions which apply depending on whether the proceeding is civil or criminal, whether the defense or prosecution is offering the character evidence, and what purpose it is being offered for.
Read more about this topic: Character Evidence
Famous quotes containing the word purpose:
“Civilization is a process in the service of Eros, whose purpose is to combine single human individuals, and after that families, then races, peoples and nations, into one great unity, the unity of mankind. Why this has to happen, we do not know; the work of Eros is precisely this.”
—Sigmund Freud (1856–1939)
“The purpose of punishment is to improve those who do the punishing—that is the final recourse of those who support punishment.”
—Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900)
“Whoever considers morality the main objective of human existence, seems to me like a person who defines the purpose of a clock as not going wrong. The first objective for a clock, is, however, that it does run; not going wrong is an additional regulative function. If not a watch’s greatest accomplishment were not going wrong, unwound watches might be the best.”
—Franz Grillparzer (1791–1872)