Censorship in The United States

Censorship In The United States

Part of a series on
Censorship
Media regulation
  • Books
  • Films
  • Internet
  • Music
  • Press
  • Radio
  • Thought
  • Speech and expression
  • Video games
Methods
  • Bleeping
  • Book burning
  • Broadcast delay
  • Burying of scholars
  • Chilling effect
  • Internet police
  • Censor bars
  • Concision
  • Conspiracy of silence
  • Content-control software
  • Euphemism (Minced oath)
  • Expurgation
  • Fogging
  • Gag order
  • Heckling
  • Internet censorship circumvention
  • Memory hole
  • National intranet
  • Newspaper theft
  • Pixelization
  • Postal
  • Prior restraint
  • Propaganda model
  • Purge
  • Revisionism
  • Sanitization/Redaction
  • Self-censorship
  • Speech code
  • Strategic lawsuit
  • Verbal offence
  • Whitewashing
  • Word filtering
Contexts
  • Blasphemy
  • Criminal
  • Corporate
  • Hate speech
  • Ideological
  • Media bias
  • Moralistic fallacy
  • Naturalistic fallacy
  • Political
  • Religious
  • Suppression of dissent
  • Systemic bias
By country
  • Censorship
  • Freedom of speech
  • Internet censorship

In general, censorship in the United States, which involves the suppression of speech or other public communication, raises issues of freedom of speech, which is constitutionally protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.

This freedom, though fundamental, has also been accompanied since its enshrinement with contest and controversy. For instance, restraints increased during periods of widespread anti-communist sentiment, as exemplified by the hearings of the House Committee on Un-American Activities. It is also legal to express certain forms of hate speech so long as one does not engage in the acts being discussed, or urge others to commit illegal acts. However, more severe forms have led to people or groups such as the Ku Klux Klan being denied certain marching permits or the Westboro Baptist Church being sued, though the initially adverse ruling against the latter was later overturned on appeal in the US Supreme Court. Thus while legal history has defined certain finite limitations, courts have historically held in general that freedom of speech, in order to exist and function, necessarily extends to even the unpopular, offensive, and distasteful.

The First Amendment is against censorship imposed by laws, but does not give protection against corporate censorship, the sanctioning of speech by spokespersons, employees, and business associates by threat of monetary loss, loss of employment, or loss of access to the marketplace. Legal expenses can sometimes be a significant unseen restraint where there may be fear of suit for libel.

Analysts from Reporters Without Borders rank the United States 47th in the world in terms in their Press Freedom Index, falling from 20th just two years earlier partly because of reaction to the Occupy movement. Certain forms of speech, such as obscenity and defamation, are restricted in major media outlets by the government or by the industry on its own.

Read more about Censorship In The United States:  History, Broadcast Censorship, Censorship of Pornography, Ban On Material Support For Foreign Boycotts, Libel, Judicial Orders, Copyright, War On Terrorism, Free Speech Zone, Corporate Censorship, Internet & Internet-related Censorship

Famous quotes containing the words united states, censorship, united and/or states:

    In the United States, it is now possible for a person eighteen years of age, female as well as male, to graduate from high school, college, or university without ever having cared for, or even held, a baby; without ever having comforted or assisted another human being who really needed help. . . . No society can long sustain itself unless its members have learned the sensitivities, motivations, and skills involved in assisting and caring for other human beings.
    Urie Bronfenbrenner (b. 1917)

    The censorship method ... is that of handing the job over to some frail and erring mortal man, and making him omnipotent on the assumption that his official status will make him infallible and omniscient.
    George Bernard Shaw (1856–1950)

    In no other country in the world is the love of property keener or more alert than in the United States, and nowhere else does the majority display less inclination toward doctrines which in any way threaten the way property is owned.
    Alexis de Tocqueville (1805–1859)

    Mr. Christian, it is about time for many people to begin to come to the White House to discuss different phases of the coal strike. When anybody comes, if his special problem concerns the state, refer him to the governor of Pennsylvania. If his problem has a national phase, refer him to the United States Coal Commission. In no event bring him to me.
    Calvin Coolidge (1872–1933)