Definition
Suppose that g is an n−dimensional semisimple Lie algebra with basis {X1, ..., Xn}. Moreover let {X1, ..., Xn} be the dual basis of g with respect to a fixed invariant bilinear form (e.g. the Killing form) on g. The Casimir element Ω is an element of the universal enveloping algebra U(g) given by the formula
Although the definition of the Casimir element refers to a particular choice of basis in the Lie algebra, it is easy to show that the resulting element Ω is independent of this choice. Moreover, the invariance of the bilinear form used in the definition implies that the Casimir element commutes with all elements of the Lie algebra g, and hence lies in the center of the universal enveloping algebra U(g).
Given any representation ρ of g on a vector space V, possibly infinite-dimensional, the corresponding Casimir invariant is ρ(Ω), the linear operator on V given by the formula
A special case of this construction plays an important role in differential geometry and global analysis. Suppose that a connected Lie group G with the Lie algebra g acts on a differentiable manifold M, then elements of g are represented by first order differential operators on M. The representation ρ is on the space of smooth functions on M. In this situation the Casimir invariant is the G–invariant second order differential operator on M defined by the above formula.
More general Casimir invariants may also be defined, commonly occurring in the study of pseudo-differential operators in Fredholm theory.
Read more about this topic: Casimir Invariant
Famous quotes containing the word definition:
“The very definition of the real becomes: that of which it is possible to give an equivalent reproduction.... The real is not only what can be reproduced, but that which is always already reproduced. The hyperreal.”
—Jean Baudrillard (b. 1929)
“The physicians say, they are not materialists; but they are:MSpirit is matter reduced to an extreme thinness: O so thin!—But the definition of spiritual should be, that which is its own evidence. What notions do they attach to love! what to religion! One would not willingly pronounce these words in their hearing, and give them the occasion to profane them.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)
“It is very hard to give a just definition of love. The most we can say of it is this: that in the soul, it is a desire to rule; in the spirit, it is a sympathy; and in the body, it is but a hidden and subtle desire to possess—after many mysteries—what one loves.”
—François, Duc De La Rochefoucauld (1613–1680)