Model Comparison
As of August 2010 the CRS has two families (CRS-1 and CRS-3) with each 4 models of main-chassis.
| Model | number of slots with interfaces | max Full-Duplex throughput per system | Dimensions in cm. L x B x H (excl. front-cover and cable-mgt) |
max power consumption max. capacity power-converters |
max. nr. of 10 Gb ethernet interfaces | Link to product-specs plus: Overview of the CRS-1 series |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRS-1 4 slot single shelf |
4 | 320 Gbit/s | 76.9 x 44.8 x 76.91 | 2551 Watt 4 kW |
32 | Introducing the 4 slots CRS-1 Interactive presentation CRS-1:4 |
| CRS-1 8 slot single shelf |
8 | 640 Gbit/s | 99.06 x 44.45 x 93.0 | 4834 Watt 7 kW |
64 | Introducing the 8 slots CRS-1 Cisco CRS-1 8-Slot Single-Shelf System |
| CRS-1 16 slot single shelf |
16 | 1.2 Tbit/s | 213.36 x 59.94 x 91.44 | 9630 Watt 13.2 kW |
128 | Presentation of 16 slots CRS-1 Cisco CRS-1 16-Slot Single-Shelf System |
| CRS-1 multishelf platform | 1152 | 92 Tbit/s | 213.36 x 59.94 x 91.44 dimensions are per shelf maximum 70 shelves in one system |
8,216 | General brochure for the CRS-1 series Cisco CRS-1 24-Slot Fabric-Card Chassis |
|
| CRS-3 4 slot single shelf |
4 | 1.12 Tbit/s | 76.2 x 47.12 x 76.91 | ? 4 kW |
4 slots per shelf x 10 | CRS-3 Video datasheet |
| CRS-3 8 slot single shelf |
8 | 2.24 Tbit/s | 99.06 x 44.45 x 93.0 | ? 7 kW |
8 slots per shelf x 10 | |
| CRS-3 16 slot single shelf |
16 | 4.48 Tbit/s | 213.36 x 59.94 x 91.44 | ? 13.2 kW |
16 slots per shelf x 10 | |
| CRS-3 multishelf platform | 1152 | 322 Tbit/s | 213.36 x 59.94 x 91.44 dimensions per shelf max. 72+8 shelves in one system |
Read more about this topic: Carrier Routing System
Famous quotes containing the words model and/or comparison:
“When you model yourself on people, you should try to resemble their good sides.”
—Molière [Jean Baptiste Poquelin] (1622–1673)
“The comparison between Coleridge and Johnson is obvious in so far as each held sway chiefly by the power of his tongue. The difference between their methods is so marked that it is tempting, but also unnecessary, to judge one to be inferior to the other. Johnson was robust, combative, and concrete; Coleridge was the opposite. The contrast was perhaps in his mind when he said of Johnson: “his bow-wow manner must have had a good deal to do with the effect produced.””
—Virginia Woolf (1882–1941)