Carlson Symmetric Form - Negative Arguments

Negative Arguments

In general, the arguments x, y, z of Carlson's integrals may not be real and negative, as this would place a branch point on the path of integration, making the integral ambiguous. However, if the second argument of, or the fourth argument, p, of is negative, then this results in a simple pole on the path of integration. In these cases the Cauchy principal value (finite part) of the integrals may be of interest; these are

and

\begin{align}\mathrm{p.v.}\; R_{J}(x,y,z,-p) & = \frac{(q - y) R_{J}(x,y,z,q) - 3 R_{F}(x,y,z) + 3 \sqrt{y} R_{C}(x z,- p q)}{y + p} \\ & = \frac{(q - y) R_{J}(x,y,z,q) - 3 R_{F}(x,y,z) + 3 \sqrt{\frac{x y z}{x z + p q}} R_{C}(x z + p q,p q)}{y + p} \end{align}

where

which must be greater than zero for to be evaluated. This may be arranged by permuting x, y and z so that the value of y is between that of x and z.

Read more about this topic:  Carlson Symmetric Form

Famous quotes containing the words negative and/or arguments:

    “The negative always wins at last, but I like it none the better for that.”
    —Mason Cooley (b. 1927)

    “Through Plato Aristotle came to believe in God, but Plato never attempted to prove His reality. Aristotle had to do so. Plato contemplated Him; Aristotle produced arguments to demonstrate Him. Plato never defined Him, but Aristotle thought God through logically and concluded with entire satisfaction to himself that He was the Unmoved Mover.”
    —Edith Hamilton (1867–1963)