Cantor's Theorem - Proof

Proof

Two sets are equinumerous (have the same cardinality) if and only if there exists a one-to-one correspondence between them. To establish Cantor's theorem it is enough to show that, for any given set A, no function f from A into, the power set of A, can be surjective, i.e. to show the existence of at least one subset of A that is not an element of the image of A under f. Such a subset, is given by the following construction:

This means, by definition, that for all x in A, xB if and only if xf(x). For all x the sets B and f(x) cannot be the same because B was constructed from elements of A whose images (under f) did not include themselves. More specifically, consider any xA, then either xf(x) or xf(x). In the former case, f(x) cannot equal B because xf(x) by assumption and xB by the construction of B. In the latter case, f(x) cannot equal B because xf(x) by assumption and xB by the construction of B.

Thus there is no x such that f(x) = B; in other words, B is not in the image of f. Because B is in the power set of A, the power set of A has a greater cardinality than A itself.

Another way to think of the proof is that B, empty or non-empty, is always in the power set of A. For f to be onto, some element of A must map to B. But that leads to a contradiction: no element of B can map to B because that would contradict the criterion of membership in B, thus the element mapping to B must not be an element of B meaning that it satisfies the criterion for membership in B, another contradiction. So the assumption that an element of A maps to B must be false; and f can not be onto.

Because of the double occurrence of x in the expression "xf(x)", this is a diagonal argument.

Read more about this topic:  Cantor's Theorem

Famous quotes containing the word proof:

    The chief contribution of Protestantism to human thought is its massive proof that God is a bore.
    —H.L. (Henry Lewis)

    The source of Pyrrhonism comes from failing to distinguish between a demonstration, a proof and a probability. A demonstration supposes that the contradictory idea is impossible; a proof of fact is where all the reasons lead to belief, without there being any pretext for doubt; a probability is where the reasons for belief are stronger than those for doubting.
    Andrew Michael Ramsay (1686–1743)

    If some books are deemed most baneful and their sale forbid, how, then, with deadlier facts, not dreams of doting men? Those whom books will hurt will not be proof against events. Events, not books, should be forbid.
    Herman Melville (1819–1891)