Cancer in Cats - Research

Research

Laboratory cats have been used in research for a wide range of diseases including stroke and diabetes to AIDS. Although less than 1% of research on animal illnesses have been dedicated to cats, animal testing is useless due to the lack of similarities in the types and symptoms of diseases of non-human animals with that of humans. Ironically, human testing still needs to be done on humans to ensure accuracy of test results, regardless of whether animal testing was done or not. Many are now calling vivisection and animal testing a cruel pseudoscience, used and manipulated by corporations to get the test results they want.

Despite opposition from organizations such as those advocating animal rights, controversial animal testing is still used in cancer research centers. These research practices are continually being conducted on the basis that its benefits to humans outweigh the costs to humans, despite the unfair costs to innocent non-human animals. Animal testing laboratories have been caught in the act of getting their feline test subjects from animal shelters

According to Kim Sterling, associate teaching professor of oncology at the University of Missouri College of Veterinary Medicine, the use of small animals in predicting human health care procedures is of significant benefit to humans because they are affected in similar, but not exactly the same, ways by the same diseases. This is the same analogy used in reference to cats and their unwilling role in advancing human cancer treatment research.

It is research like this that has led to a potential link between cat parasites and brain cancer in humans. Cats carry the parasite toxoplasma gondii. According to research ecologist Kevin Lafferty, of the University of California, Santa Barbara, this parasite is known to “behave in ways that could stimulate cells towards cancerous states”. Therefore, torturous research on cats with this parasite can help to better understand the risks of brain cancer for humans in contact with such cats.

Cats have also been used to further studies in the field of Cancer stem cell research. Small animals, like cats, experience faster rates of cancer development. As a result, they are good preclinical models for understanding processes like immortalization and its role in promoting cancerous tumors. The absence of immortalization means a cell can no longer undergo malignant transformation.Since these transformations are the basis for cancerous cell reproduction, this research can prove useful for future cancer treatments and understanding how to stop the spread of cancer in the body.

However, feline cancer research is not limited to what laboratory cats can do for other animals, there is also research being done by humans to see what can be done to improve treatment options for feline cancer. Advances, though slower than that in other animals, are being made in the field of feline cancer. This includes advances in chemotherapy research, immunization protocols and radiation therapy. In addition, there are clinical trials offering trial research treatment options for cats with cancer.

One of such treatments is the cat's claw. Although they share the same name, the cat’s claw (also known as Uncaria tomentosa or uña de gato) refers not to the animal cat but to a native plant of the Amazon Rainforest in Peru, South America. Cat's claw is still under research for its immunotherapic, antiproliferative abilities in suppressing cancer proliferation in humans; however, it has been deemed suitable for cat cancer treatment. Indeed drugs containing cat claw extracts are available as feline cancer treatment options

Nonetheless, feline cancer research into this, as well as other treatment options, remains an ongoing process.

Read more about this topic:  Cancer In Cats

Famous quotes containing the word research:

    The great question that has never been answered, and which I have not yet been able to answer, despite my thirty years of research into the feminine soul, is “What does a woman want?”
    Sigmund Freud (1856–1939)

    The research on gender and morality shows that women and men looked at the world through very different moral frameworks. Men tend to think in terms of “justice” or absolute “right and wrong,” while women define morality through the filter of how relationships will be affected. Given these basic differences, why would men and women suddenly agree about disciplining children?
    Ron Taffel (20th century)

    It is a good morning exercise for a research scientist to discard a pet hypothesis every day before breakfast. It keeps him young.
    Konrad Lorenz (1903–1989)