California Proposition 62 (2004)
| State government |
|---|
| Gubernatorial elections |
|
1861 · 1906 · 1910 · 1914 · 1918 · 1922 |
| Lieutenant governor elections |
|
1994 · 1998 · 2002 · 2006 · 2010 |
| Secretary of State elections |
|
1994 · 1998 · 2002 · 2006 · 2010 · 2014 |
| Controller elections |
|
1994 · 1998 · 2002 · 2006 · 2010 |
| Treasurer elections |
|
1994 · 1998 · 2002 · 2006 · 2010 |
| Attorney General elections |
|
1994 · 1998 · 2002 · 2006 · 2010 |
| Insurance Comm. elections |
|
1994 · 1998 · 2002 · 2006 · 2010 |
| SPI elections |
|
1994 · 1998 · 2002 · 2006 |
| Legislature |
|---|
| State Senate elections |
|
1992 · 1994 · 1996 · 1998 · 2000 · 2002 |
| State Assembly elections |
|
1992 · 1994 · 1996 · 1998 · 2000 · 2002 |
| Judicial |
|---|
|
1994 · 1998 · 2002 · 2006 |
| Propositions | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full list | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
| Elections by year |
|---|
| State elections |
|
Nov 1992 · Nov 1994 · Nov 1996 · Nov 1998 |
| Primary elections |
|
2000: Democratic · Republican |
| Los Angeles |
|---|
| Mayoral elections |
|
1993 · 1997 · 2001 · 2005 · 2009 · 2013 |
| City Attorney elections |
|
2009 |
| San Diego |
|---|
| Mayoral elections |
|
2012 |
| San Francisco |
|---|
| Mayoral elections |
|
1975 · 1979 · 1983 · 1987 · 1991 · 1995 |
| Board of Supervisors elections |
|
1977 · 1996 · 1998 · 2000 · 2002 · 2004 |
| General elections |
|
Mar 2004 · Nov 2004 · Nov 2005 · Jun 2006 |
- view
- talk
- edit
Proposition 62 was a California ballot proposition on the November 2, 2004 ballot. It failed to pass with 5,119,155 (46.1%) votes in favor and 5,968,770 (53.9%) against.
Officially known as the Voter Choice Open Primary Act, the proposition was an initiative constitutional amendment and statute that provided for a modified blanket primary (two-round) election system like that used in the state of Louisiana.
Under the provisions of the proposition, instead of traditional partisan primary elections for statewide offices (in which voters have to be registered with a political party to choose the nominee of that party in the primary), all candidates for election would appear on the primary election ballot (first round ballot), and all voters could vote for any candidate regardless of the party affiliation of the voter or candidates. The two candidates with the most votes (regardless of party or lack thereof) would later appear on the general election (second round) ballot.
Prop 62 would have affected elections to all statewide elected officers (Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Attorney General, Insurance Commissioner, Controller, Secretary of State, and Treasurer), for the California State Legislature, and for federal congressional elections (to both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate. The proposition did exempt presidential primary elections and elections of party central committees.
The provisions of Proposition 62 conflicted with those of Proposition 60, which the California State Legislature referred on the ballot. That proposition essentially re-affirmed the existing partisan primary system. The California Constitution provides that if the provisions of two approved propositions are in conflict, only the provisions of the measure with the higher number of "yes" votes at the statewide election take effect. Since Prop 60 passed and Prop 62 did not, the issue was moot.
Read more about California Proposition 62 (2004): Official Summary
Famous quotes containing the words california and/or proposition:
“The California fever is not likely to take us off.... There is neither romance nor glory in digging for gold after the manner of the pictures in the geography of diamond washing in Brazil.”
—Rutherford Birchard Hayes (1822–1893)
“I hope I may claim in the present work to have made it probable that the laws of arithmetic are analytic judgments and consequently a priori. Arithmetic thus becomes simply a development of logic, and every proposition of arithmetic a law of logic, albeit a derivative one. To apply arithmetic in the physical sciences is to bring logic to bear on observed facts; calculation becomes deduction.”
—Gottlob Frege (1848–1925)