California Proposition 22 (2000)
| State government |
|---|
| Gubernatorial elections |
|
1861 · 1906 · 1910 · 1914 · 1918 · 1922 |
| Lieutenant governor elections |
|
1994 · 1998 · 2002 · 2006 · 2010 |
| Secretary of State elections |
|
1994 · 1998 · 2002 · 2006 · 2010 · 2014 |
| Controller elections |
|
1994 · 1998 · 2002 · 2006 · 2010 |
| Treasurer elections |
|
1994 · 1998 · 2002 · 2006 · 2010 |
| Attorney General elections |
|
1994 · 1998 · 2002 · 2006 · 2010 |
| Insurance Comm. elections |
|
1994 · 1998 · 2002 · 2006 · 2010 |
| SPI elections |
|
1994 · 1998 · 2002 · 2006 |
| Legislature |
|---|
| State Senate elections |
|
1992 · 1994 · 1996 · 1998 · 2000 · 2002 |
| State Assembly elections |
|
1992 · 1994 · 1996 · 1998 · 2000 · 2002 |
| Judicial |
|---|
|
1994 · 1998 · 2002 · 2006 |
| Propositions | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full list | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
| Elections by year |
|---|
| State elections |
|
Nov 1992 · Nov 1994 · Nov 1996 · Nov 1998 |
| Primary elections |
|
2000: Democratic · Republican |
| Los Angeles |
|---|
| Mayoral elections |
|
1993 · 1997 · 2001 · 2005 · 2009 · 2013 |
| City Attorney elections |
|
2009 |
| San Diego |
|---|
| Mayoral elections |
|
2012 |
| San Francisco |
|---|
| Mayoral elections |
|
1975 · 1979 · 1983 · 1987 · 1991 · 1995 |
| Board of Supervisors elections |
|
1977 · 1996 · 1998 · 2000 · 2002 · 2004 |
| General elections |
|
Mar 2004 · Nov 2004 · Nov 2005 · Jun 2006 |
- view
- talk
- edit
Proposition 22 was a law enacted by California voters in March 2000 to restrict marriages to only those between opposite-sex couples. In May 2008, it was struck down by the California Supreme Court as contrary to the state constitution.
The Act was proposed by means of the initiative process. It was authored by the state senator William "Pete" Knight and is known informally as the Knight initiative. Voters adopted the measure on March 7, 2000 with 61% in favor to 39% against. This large margin of victory surprised many, since a Field Poll immediately prior to the election estimated support at only 53%, with 40% against and 7% undecided.
The Act added Section 308.5 of the Family Code, which read "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California". Because the Act was an ordinary statute, it could be struck down if it were inconsistent with the state constitution. This occurred on May 15, 2008 when the state supreme court, ruling on In re Marriage Cases, declared that same-sex couples had a constitutional right to marry. This 4–3 decision invalidated Proposition 22 and some related California laws.
Despite the brevity of Proposition 22 (it added only fourteen words to the Family Code) its effect provoked debate long after its passage. In November 2008 California voters overturned the In re Marriage Cases decision by approving an amendment of the state constitution called Proposition 8.
Read more about California Proposition 22 (2000): Statutory Framework, Results of Vote, Disputes Over Its Effect, Invalidation
Famous quotes containing the words california and/or proposition:
“Resorts advertised for waitresses, specifying that they “must appear in short clothes or no engagement.” Below a Gospel Guide column headed, “Where our Local Divines Will Hang Out Tomorrow,” was an account of spirited gun play at the Bon Ton. In Jeff Winney’s California Concert Hall, patrons “bucked the tiger” under the watchful eye of Kitty Crawhurst, popular “lady” gambler.”
—Administration in the State of Colo, U.S. public relief program (1935-1943)
“The perfect God in his revelations of himself has never got to the length of one such proposition as you, his prophets, state.”
—Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)