Building Energy Simulation Test

The Building Energy Simulation Test (BESTEST) is a project developed by the International Energy Agency for practical implementation procedure and data for an overall IEA validation methodology which has been under development by NREL since 1981.

The project methodology is based on a combination of empirical validation, analytical verification and comparative analysis techniques. A method was developed to systematically test whole building energy simulation programs and analyze the sources of predictive disagreement. State of the art software was examined such as BLAST, DOE2, COMFIE, ESP-r, SERIRES, S3PAS, TASE, HOT2000, and TRNSYS. In order to conduct a uniform set of unambiguous test cases and test tried to describe the cases in a fashion that allows many different building simulation programs to be tested. Output values for cases, such as annual loads, annual temperatures, annual peak loads, and some hourly data are compared in relation with the diagnostic logic to determine the algorithm responsible for predictive differences. The more realistic cases and geometrically simple cases, such as cases BESTEST600 to 650, test ability of the programs to model effects such as thermal mass, direct solar gain windows, shading devices, infiltration, internal heat gain, sunspaces, earth coupling, and setback thermostat control.

This approach succeeded to be a reference evaluation methodology for other simple or complex building energy simulation programs. The BESTEST procedure has been used by most building simulation software developers as part of their standard quality control program. The BESTEST method has shown that when a program shows major disagreement with the reference programs, the primary cause is usually a bug, faulty algorithm, or documentation problem.

Famous quotes containing the words building, energy, simulation and/or test:

    The real dividing line between early childhood and middle childhood is not between the fifth year and the sixth year—it is more nearly when children are about seven or eight, moving on toward nine. Building the barrier at six has no psychological basis. It has come about only from the historic-economic-political fact that the age of six is when we provide schools for all.
    James L. Hymes, Jr. (20th century)

    The flattering, if arbitrary, label, First Lady of the Theatre, takes its toll. The demands are great, not only in energy but eventually in dramatic focus. It is difficult, if not impossible, for a star to occupy an inch of space without bursting seams, cramping everyone else’s style and unbalancing a play. No matter how self-effacing a famous player may be, he makes an entrance as a casual neighbor and the audience interest shifts to the house next door.
    Helen Hayes (1900–1993)

    Life, as the most ancient of all metaphors insists, is a journey; and the travel book, in its deceptive simulation of the journey’s fits and starts, rehearses life’s own fragmentation. More even than the novel, it embraces the contingency of things.
    Jonathan Raban (b. 1942)

    The face we see was never young,
    Nor could it ever have been old.

    For he, to whom we had applied
    Our shopman’s test of age and worth,
    Was elemental when he died,
    As he was ancient at his birth:
    Edwin Arlington Robinson (1869–1935)