Comparison of 18000 and 18100
The following table gives a comparison between 18000 and 18100. There are some anomalies and these are described in the notes.
| Value | 18000 | 18100 | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weight (tons) | 115 | 129 | - |
| Turbine horsepower | 10,300 | 9,000 | (1) |
| Power absorbed by compressor | 7,800 | 6,000 | (1) |
| Output horsepower | 2,500 | 3,000 | (1) |
| Number of traction motors | 4 | 6 | - |
| Total traction motor horsepower | 2,500 | 2,450 | (2) |
| Starting tractive effort (lbf) | 31,500 | 60,000 | (3) |
Notes:
- In 18000, output horsepower is 24% of total horsepower and in 18100, output horsepower is 33% of total horsepower. This suggests that 18100 had the higher thermal efficiency but, in practice, 18000 had the higher thermal efficiency. The horsepower figures should, therefore, be regarded with some scepticism.
- Where electric transmission is used, the horsepower of the traction motors is usually 81% (i.e. 90% x 90%) that of the prime mover. The figure for 18100 is therefore about right but the figure for 18000 looks anomalous.
- lbf = pound-force
Read more about this topic: British Rail 18000
Famous quotes containing the word comparison:
“The difference between human vision and the image perceived by the faceted eye of an insect may be compared with the difference between a half-tone block made with the very finest screen and the corresponding picture as represented by the very coarse screening used in common newspaper pictorial reproduction. The same comparison holds good between the way Gogol saw things and the way average readers and average writers see things.”
—Vladimir Nabokov (1899–1977)