Bragg's Law - Selection Rules and Practical Crystallography

Selection Rules and Practical Crystallography

Bragg's law, as stated above, can be used to obtain the lattice spacing of a particular cubic system through the following relation:

where is the lattice spacing of the cubic crystal, and, and are the Miller indices of the Bragg plane. Combining this relation with Bragg's law:

One can derive selection rules for the Miller indices for different cubic Bravais lattices; here, selection rules for several will be given as is.

Selection rules for the Miller indices
Bravais lattice Example compounds Allowed reflections Forbidden reflections
Simple cubic Po Any h, k, l None
Body-centered cubic Fe, W, Ta, Cr h + k + l = even h + k + l = odd
Face-centered cubic Cu, Al, Ni, NaCl, LiH, PbS h, k, l all odd or all even h, k, l mixed odd and even
Diamond F.C.C. Si, Ge all odd, or all even with h+k+l = 4n h, k, l mixed odd and even, or all even with h+k+l ≠ 4n
Triangular lattice Ti, Zr, Cd, Be l even, h + 2k ≠ 3n h + 2k = 3n for odd l

These selection rules can be used for any crystal with the given crystal structure. KCl exhibits a fcc cubic structure. However, the K+ and the Cl− ion have the same number of electrons and are quite close in size, so that the diffraction pattern becomes essentially the same as for a simple cubic structure with half the lattice parameter. Selection rules for other structures can be referenced elsewhere, or derived.

Read more about this topic:  Bragg's Law

Famous quotes containing the words selection, rules and/or practical:

    The books for young people say a great deal about the selection of Friends; it is because they really have nothing to say about Friends. They mean associates and confidants merely.
    Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)

    A scholar, in his Segmenta, left a note,
    As follows, “The Ruler of Reality,
    If more unreal than New Haven, is not
    A real ruler, but rules what is unreal.”
    Wallace Stevens (1879–1955)

    General scepticism is the live mental attitude of refusing to conclude. It is a permanent torpor of the will, renewing itself in detail towards each successive thesis that offers, and you can no more kill it off by logic than you can kill off obstinacy or practical joking.
    William James (1842–1910)