Bond V. United States (2000)
| Bond v. United States | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States |
||||||
| Argued February, 2000 Decided April 17, 2000 |
||||||
| Full case name | Bond v United States | |||||
| Citations | 529 U.S. 334 (more) | |||||
| Argument | Oral argument | |||||
| Holding | ||||||
| That the agent's physical manipulation of petitioner's carry-on bag violated the Fourth Amendment's proscription against unreasonable searches. | ||||||
| Court membership | ||||||
|
||||||
| Case opinions | ||||||
| Majority | Rehnquist, joined by Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg | |||||
| Dissent | Breyer, joined by Scalia | |||||
Bond v United States, 529 U.S. 334 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court Fourth Amendment case that applied the ruling of Minnesota v. Dickerson to luggage, which held that police may not physically manipulate items without a warrant without violating the Fourth Amendment.
Read more about Bond V. United States (2000): Background, Opinion of The Court
Famous quotes containing the words bond, united and/or states:
“The bond between a man and his profession is similar to that which ties him to his country; it is just as complex, often ambivalent, and in general it is understood completely only when it is broken: by exile or emigration in the case of one’s country, by retirement in the case of a trade or profession.”
—Primo Levi (1919–1987)
“The popular colleges of the United States are turning out more educated people with less originality and fewer geniuses than any other country.”
—Caroline Nichols Churchill (1833–?)
“The corporate grip on opinion in the United States is one of the wonders of the Western World. No First World country has ever managed to eliminate so entirely from its media all objectivity—much less dissent.”
—Gore Vidal (b. 1925)