Bond V. United States (2000)
Bond v. United States | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States |
||||||
Argued February, 2000 Decided April 17, 2000 |
||||||
Full case name | Bond v United States | |||||
Citations | 529 U.S. 334 (more) | |||||
Argument | Oral argument | |||||
Holding | ||||||
That the agent's physical manipulation of petitioner's carry-on bag violated the Fourth Amendment's proscription against unreasonable searches. | ||||||
Court membership | ||||||
|
||||||
Case opinions | ||||||
Majority | Rehnquist, joined by Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg | |||||
Dissent | Breyer, joined by Scalia |
Bond v United States, 529 U.S. 334 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court Fourth Amendment case that applied the ruling of Minnesota v. Dickerson to luggage, which held that police may not physically manipulate items without a warrant without violating the Fourth Amendment.
Read more about Bond V. United States (2000): Background, Opinion of The Court
Famous quotes containing the words bond, united and/or states:
“The ideal of men and women sharing equally in parenting and working is a vision still. What would it be like if women and men were less different from each other, if our worlds were not so foreign? A male friend who shares daily parenting told me that he knows at his very core what his wifes loving for their daughter feels like, and that this knowing creates a stronger bond between them.”
—Anonymous Mother. Ourselves and Our Children, by Boston Womens Health Book Collective, ch. 6 (1978)
“Man is to himself the most wonderful object in nature; for he cannot conceive what the body is, still less what the mind is, and least of all how a body should be united to a mind. This is the consummation of his difficulties, and yet this is his very being.”
—Blaise Pascal (16231662)
“The traveler to the United States will do well ... to prepare himself for the class-consciousness of the natives. This differs from the already familiar English version in being more extreme and based more firmly on the conviction that the class to which the speaker belongs is inherently superior to all others.”
—John Kenneth Galbraith (b. 1908)